Search results

cillian creed, macbannin's butler, is ex-rhc and a major villain in book 2. i think there's also an ex-rhc contact the players are set up to meet in book 7 but he gets killed and impersonated before they meet if im not mistaken

whether or not the spell is too strong is irrelevant to the question of what the spell does. you can always just ban it.

yeah, okay, cool, just make up stuff i never said, amazing. it's not the opposite scenario because of "muh player bias", it's the opposite scenario because the OP describes teleporting a hostile (edit: grappler, basically) (who would obviously attempt to resist), while you're describing...

...except that's the opposite scenario from that described in the OP. it's straight up irrelevant. also, that's like...a completely standard use case for the spell. i just saw the wizard use that trick to save the rogue from water weirds this past saturday. i don't know why you think this is...

bro really put his party on the magic school bus

i uh. i don't think a house cat is interacting with gut bacteria.

how do you fight gut bacteria? it's too small to interact with in any meaningful way (other then by killing its host, i guess).

this is, in the most technical sense possible, correct. it's also irrelevant, because "creature" in this context is a mechanical term to which these things do not apply. edit: it is also just not really useful. you wouldn't say the druid would be paralyzed or dominated if the fish were targeted...

the MM2 is out (or at least backers have their copies) and there's no such equivalent in it.

RAW? it works, no question. as @GMMichael said, the spell only targets a single creature, and the artificer is physically incapable of targeting the druid anyway. balance wise i don't even think it's that bad - it requires a daily resource (albeit one that gets fairly cheap at higher levels) and...

to be perfectly fair, i can think of a few video games that practically (if not literally) cannot be modified by anyone but the developers. i wouldn't necessarily call all of them bad games, but i'd certainly say their inability to be modified leaves them worse off.

i think feystags are kinda neat.

i think it's mainly because the feat lets you use 2 weapons (one held in each hand) as a spellcasting focus. i don't think it'd break anything if you let it be a different fighting style, but it does change the vibe a bit.

i think technically RAW you would be, since your mount is using its movement, not you. but RAI and logically speaking i'd say no, since even if you aren't using your movement, you are still MOVING, just using a mount.

...i forgot those existed. i wonder how those are balanced against other gifts...

you'd probably want some way to offset the upgrades, then, considering otherwise they'd just be better then other heritage gifts. maybe you need to roll to get a chance to use them or the gift and paragon gift start weaker then your average gift/paragon gift but when upgraded become better then...

Would. Next. ...wait, what's this thread about again?

easiest way to solve this is just to have a rule like "monsters of CR X+ treat their attacks as magical for the purpose of overcoming resistance/immunity" tbh

if we're only counting official dnd, then 5e. if we're counting derivatives, either 4e or pf2e (not really sure which i prefer). i'll let you decide if they're fighting for 1st or 2nd.

ohhhh, so you LIKE that players can cut loose and do all the crazy stuff a lot of DMs struggle with handling? that makes sense. i started DMing my first campaign last summer (with a5e) and i've found that i also look forward to levelling the party up (to the point i might be doing it a little...