Search results

I know. Should've worded that as "a new development for the setting" instead of "in".

I don't understand how you're all getting "Dragonmarks" will be decoupled from species. The post talks about house membership not being tied to species. Which is not the same as the dragonmarks themselves. I wouldn't be surprised if this were a new development in the settting but what I'm...

That's a common misconception, your action is only cancelled when rolling 10 or more in the panic table. Those rolls force you to take a "Panic Action" instead of the action you rolled for. A 9 or less would allow you to succeed. Even if you roll a 9 on the panic table while shooting and...

Huh... first time I hear about both of these companies.

I think I'll stay, thank you. And if you really didn't care you wouldn't have bothered. Stay mad, and wrong. Bye.

It's hard not to take the written word as anything but "literal". Then again, value and worth are subjective but the product description and price are not. Stating "it's just dice" is false, I don't see any other way to go about it. If they only want the dice and everything else holds no value...

My issue is claiming it's "just dice" when it's not. I agree that's very expensive. I wouldn't buy it either but whomever buys the sets I'm pretty sure it's not "just for the dice". You're misrepresenting the product.

I'm sorry but If you see my original comment it wasn't aimed at anyone in particular. They weren't the only one that had alluded at the price being just for the dice. In any case, English is not my first language so if there is a word to express that someone seems to be purposely describing...

I'm sorry? How can you watch a product that clearly it's not "just dice" and pretend the price point is just for "the dice"? They know better and you too. The focus is on the dice as product but what makes it collectible, special even, it's the whole package. You're paying for the production...

Claiming it's collectible makes it so. People will buy it for the purpose of collecting them. And my car analogy is exactly the same. The word "usable" in your answer is doing a ton of work right there. Aren't the dice usable? If you buy a car for the wheels, the wheels work as well, you just...

OK, but they are not selling the dice only, are they? I feel like you would buy a car just for the wheels and then complain the wheels are too expensive... And yeah, collectable is a marketing term that is used to raise the value of something due to forced scarcity... What's your point?

This is not for me but saying it's "37 usd" just for dice it's very disingenuous. You're clearly paying for the production value, the included artwork, the coin and the fact that it's a collectable.

That's definitely an option, I'm just supposing the final product will be better than the UA.

The good thing is that if D&D 2024's purported backwards compatibility pans out, you'll be able to grab the barbarian and monk directly from the 5.2 SRD and port them over to your ToV game.

Edge, please, a crumb of L5R please!!

It was like this before with 5e wasn't it? Or I'm confusing it with the Alt Covers that where only sold at FLGS?

I'll have to be "that guy" but you've got it completely wrong. The mystery of the Icons is never revealed in the adventure and they remain very ambiguous as a concept.