Search results

Tom Seleck? Ok hit me now. :)

1)effects overlaping not stacking 2)same as need x on a d20 to hit. both =ease of play. Have the effects of a spell change #1 muddies water unesecarliy and breaks spirit of d20 and ease of play. Would be same as having in text of a monster in order to hit it pc must role under a certain number...

I never saw it as a house rule actualy even though in retrospect I see it would be concidered one. Just d20 as a system makes sense. With rules like similar effects overlaping not stacking. If some one then in the desciption of a spell breaks this rule the ease of play of d20 goes out the...

If so then yes as counterspelling is its own set of rules. As long as it is specifical a counterspell action. Using the same spell as a counterspell to the original yes. EDIT: I have never seen someone use the same spell to counterspell so I am foggy on how this works. I have seen it doen with...

My interpretation of the question was what would your ruling be. Not what is the rule for this. So wether this is a house rule is not pertinant. That is unless the original poster was indeed lookign for the official ruling. If so I would have stated this is my house rule as opposed to my opinion.

Not sure I understand what you are asking. Can one stack 2 of the same spell? No unless specficaly stated by the spell. Would a mirror image coming in contact with another mirror image cancel each other? Hell no that makes no sense to me.

I can't think of any I have come across. If I did most likley I would rule the same. Temporarily nulify effect for duration of the new spell.

Oh I know I just think this is one of those things that wasn't fixed with 3e and is a stand over from 1e. In 3.5 I believe they fixed light canceling darkness but IMO the same holds true for hsate/slow. I don't think spells that have oposits should cancel one and other. That is what dispel...

Nope I'd rule 0 it. If light doesn't dispel darkness why should slow dispel haste. I say this an old byproduct of 1e not picked up in conversion. I believe in 1e this is how it worked. The spells canceled each other. Sorry spells of oposite efects shouldn't dispell the original spell just...

I on the other hand would say normal movement. Haste has a duration as does slow. When slow is cast on a hasted character it doesn't cancel it completely it just negates the effects of the haste for the duration of the slow. So if a higher level mage cast the haste eventualy the slow would wear...

NPC bubble Origin: basicaly played with same group for many many years. There was always someone away. The persons character was whisked away by the NPC bubble. When the player showed up again the reapeared fromt he NPC bubble.

You can only have 3 classes in NWN. Don't know why they did this though.

I see an outline of a box in that the word poll and to the left of it the red x of a broken graphic.

Same here. Often text will beradable while images loading

Damn my early morning foggy brain and lack of playing in a long long time. You are correct the weight restriction should only be for an object. In other words: You can turn yourself invisible, you can turn your ogre buddy invisble but you can't turn a mountain invisible.

Well when you look at target you find half the answer. Target: the character or a creature or object weighing no more than 100 lb./level. Therefore if target is caster his/her wieght doesn't matter. Wieght matters only if cast on something/someone else. Personaly I would say the wieght includes...

not quite an enemy doesn't need to be denide dex bonus to ac to be sneak attacked. Now there are abilites like improved uncanny dodge that negate a flank sneak attack. However a rogue flanking an opotent even with fulla c can sneak attack as long as they are flanking said opponent.

More accuratley it is both.

A backstab/sneak attack is not a full round action. Any time a rogue attacks an opontent from a flank is sneak attacking. A rogue can sneak attack with 2 weapons if he has a full round action left in a round eg takes a 5' step.

I couldn't remember posting in this thread. I was beginign to wonder if I was going insane. Then I noticed the date on the post. Man 2002 wow.