Search results

... ... ...That was intentional. Yup. Mmhmm. 🙃

Manipulative language and banishing criticism to the gulag isn't 5D chess. It's Standard Corporate Abuse Tactics

Ah. Okay, Owlbears and gelatinous cubes are marketable, got it. If they're trying to kill the SRD just to get their hands back on those monsters, that's all kinds of horse puckey.

They already have that, though. They have the Product Identity. Do owlbears not appear on their PI list? I know Gelatinous Cubes don't, but no one was beating down the door to make a Gelatinous Cube Jello™️ Mold or whatever. None of their competitors are really in the toy business like Hasbro...

Eh, potation portation.

I'd LOVE an owlbear plushie. They don't need to kill the OGL to release those, though.

If they're trying to clear the air, it's still pretty stinky.

Wow, Jeremy Crawford is posting about the survey thing. Yet he's been silent on the OGL for weeks.

It's only bad design if it's intended to be a vital clue. If it's missable Easter Egg content, it adds value to those who take the obscure language!

Who's on first?

I think I'm done live-posting updates for the moment. It's exhausting!

That seems to square with DnD Short's source info: So the feedback is seen, but only the bubbles. The commentary is still not being taken into account. I'm not entirely sure how you'd fix that with the volume of info coming in, though.

A possible explanation of this:

long story short: He's getting conflicting information from sources he trusts, and is trying to verify.

DnD Shorts is addressing this now:

They very carefully avoided much information, but they talked about works used in the OGL 1.0a in the past tense, which is telling.

I mean, you can laugh, but there were plenty of content creators who thought they were influencing the direction of 5.5e by providing thoughtful feedback. They really did think they were being listened to. This is a painful revelation for some of them. They've been used as basically free...

LOL Ah. Okay. That makes sense, then. It sounded like you were talking about Democratic Socialism because you were. :LOL:

You know, you can say Socialism. Because that's what socialists like me seek. Democatic control of financial capital and the means of production.