Search results

Love it!

In general, as Morrus said, the power levels are meant to be balanced even between O5e and A5e, so there shouldn't be any issues. However, 3PP stuff may or may not attempt to align themselves with the same ideas of balance, so YMMV. But if you find that most people say a particular 3PP adventure...

I also can't find a specific ruling, but I would say that it simply works like this: when you use a maneuver, you do whatever it says you do as part of the maneuver. This is an important distinction for a few reasons. First, you are using a maneuver, not an attack action, so the maneuver...

IMO, the classes should be compared to each other and not to o5e. O5e has a lot of balance problems and many of those were addressed with A5e, so I expect many players who liked to take advantage of broken options will be disappointed to find they actually have to try now. As a player, I have...

I already made edits to correct some mistakes, but you can't just add "doesn't" in there to adjust the meaning. As written, there are a couple implications that are valid interpretations. 1) There is no indication as to what happens if the spell does not end early and the creature is not native...

It doesn't. Upcasting increases the duration, which has no affect on someone native to a different plane as they are just banished outright, or at least I could see that argument being made given how the spell is written. For example: "If the spell ends before its maximum duration, the target...

Page 14 seems to have the wrong author credit.

Interesting. I would be curious to know how you were playing: VTT? Pen and paper? I ask only because back in my PF1e days, we were playing with paper and it really did get annoying tracking things. But PF2e (and A5e), we are playing with a VTT and even PF2e doesn't seem too crunchy anymore...

Possibly errata? The Spy and Spymaster both have shortswords, but on their stat blocks, they do piercing damage. The shortsword does slashing damage in A5e rather than the piercing damage it did in O5e, so it doesn't make a lot of sense for it to randomly do a different type of damage on these...

Honestly, I wish they'd use this opportunity to completely sever the ties and stop caring about being backward compatible, but I know that was one of the selling points, so they probably won't.

I do believe the cover should say "Twilight" and not "Twiligh." Whoops.

Since delaying isn't a thing in 5e, that would just fall under readying an action, which is something you can already do. The only difference here is that the thing you do would specifically apply TO their thing as opposed to just happening when they do their thing. Which is an idea I like.

I believe that is just at character creation. Not saying that's a problem or anything, just something to keep in mind.

I am currently playing a rogue/ranger multiclass who is, in fact, a sneaky sort 👀👀. He was always meant to focus on ranged combat, but the current traditions are sorely lacking in that department.

I've seen a number of small (or large) changes to spells and items, so I suspect it was intentional. But I could be wrong.

There's a 3rd party O5e supplement called Batlezoo Bestiary that adds a whole "Monster Hunter" subsystem. Obviously it's not an official list, but it might be what you're looking for.

As written, I think it's also notable that Two-Weapon Fighting specifically calls out "If you have the Extra Attack feature..." whereas the feature you are referencing above is called Additional Attack. This suggests that the wording there only applies to the more basic Extra Attack feature and...

That is also how I read it, but since it is different from O5e (and earlier editions?) and that is what my group all thinks of when they think of the spell, I was hoping to make sure. Thanks!

Fun is subjective. What is clear is that they intentionally changed the wording here. In O5e, it's quite clear that you always roll for a new body; here, it is implied that only when you get a new body do you get a new heritage and you only get a new body if the original body is not available. I...

The A5e spell has different wording from the O5e spell in such a way that makes me curious if you don't actually have to pick a new heritage. Specifically, it says, "You return the target to life, provided the target’s soul is willing and able to return to its body. If you only have a piece of...