Search results

Do you think making the minus 5 to hit plus ten damage from the old feats are too strong in the revision?

The one problem with the change isn't the limiting of smites once per round(I think they could have fixed this with the new casting rules), kits the fact that you can't polearm master because of the bonus action usage.

I kinda agree with sly. I would like more ebberon.

I don't want a book full of drizzle and emmaminster stats. Brief descriptions will do. Oh yeah, if they are just gonna redo 6e subclasses,do them right this time.

Well if you go CBE, you basically want 3 xbows. 2 handxbows and a heavy for range. Put that feat to work.

That's fine I was just noting hiw my group plays. They really stacked melee feats this time around. I think that range weapon masteries might be the reason. I like the thought of dervish style rangers now but the dual battleaxe wielding barby is gone.

I don't have those problems with my group. They don't know how to power game really. A couple did multiclass, but mote for character reasons.

4e had dex con and wis as a secondary stat for the fighter. It was a nice thing about 4th. I always thought that classes that aren't as mad as monks and pallys should have a something like 4e did. I dug the cha barby in 4e. The way that 4e gave classes roles, this gave a way to dip into other roles.

Burn it all down#vforvendatta!🤬

Dudes, companies are naming new stuff old stuff(look at modernwarfare). I'm guessing they all went to the same buisiness seminar telling them to use nostalgia to bring in customers.

The best part of the pally is that alot of his other abilities where moved to a faster activation. Instead of novas, the pally is Frontline support. Some people don't like that, I'm cool with it.

Yes it was that bad I still have the books and the stack of erratic I printed from it. It was a huge pet peeve of mine when 4th was coming out. They treated it as a video game that could be fixed online afterwords.

I'm just guessing but I think 6th edition will be a much bigger change.

I wasn't just referring rules changes. I'm talking the day one erratta that most books needed because they didn't edit them properly. The way they changed powers online like it was a video game is another thing.

4th edition was also rushed out and had so much errata and rules changes on the online portion.

I loved the dig at gygax. Let's call a dead guy a gatekeeper.

Trust me, it was still rushed out.

I'm gonna let my players make custom. This is one of a couple things in 5.5 that I don't like.they are used to Tasha rules anyway

5e is a much bigger success than 3 and 3.5 editions. 3rd edition didn't last that long as an edition when before they rushed 3.5 out.

Look I have a ton of 5e and 3rd party 5e that is still compatible with it so I don't care if it's a new edition or not, I do consider it an upgrade for my group