Search results

I was just speaking for my group. But if that’s his problem, then you need to let that man play a PC more often!!

For all those wanting Psionics to be it’s own unique mechanical system, I wouldn’t hold your breath We might yet see a full Psion class. But I doubt we’re going to have Dicisplines/Sciences or Psionic Combat or anything that is a new system that people will have to learn. it’ll be based on...

I just strolled across this tweet as well from Crawford and I think it’s very telling for all the ~8200 Psionics threads we have going right now. To me that means there is no real impetus to develop Psionics as separate and unique from the spell casting framework that 5e already has as it...

That has only been an issue for the power gamer in my group as he tries to eek out every last shred of power he can from...whatever it is he’s trying to do. For the rest of my crew we usually either know what we’re going to do or the story pushes us to something for our characters naturally. shrug

Maybe we should split this off as a separate discussion thread focused on your build? Dunno. OP can decide if he wants that. Great leg work and I like what I'm seeing so far. I'm going to "livestream" record my thoughts below Notes The beyondness property is weird to me. Why not just make...

Let me check in on the main thread. But yeah, no. Dukkoti is not a healing kind of cleric. You gotta earn an elf's trust in Dark Sun son!

Glaive 11+1=12 Halberd 8-2=6

I think Swarmkeeper is an awesome idea/subclass. I don't think it's going to pass or get published. Onomancy was one of my favorites, though I know there are issues with its implementation as is. I hope it sees official print, but I doubt it. I think for me the for sure ones are Rune Knight...

Source: 2e Complete book of Psionics I think most of the people who have issues aren't originally psionics from 3.x forward (is my guess). Those editions were very tied to foci and audible/visible displays of power, ectoplasm, etc. 2e and earlier OTOH was the opposite. As is most sci-fi...

@ChaosOS thanks for that point on land ownership and raw resource extraction, it's also a great point. @tetrasodium I don't see the Mark of Handling having any faculties with crops or agriculture.

That is an interesting point I'd never thought about before. Given that there is a Mark & House that dominates animal breeding/handling, it is surprising that one hasn't arisen related to monopolization of food resources themselves. I wonder @Hellcow if there is a reason there no a Mark...

Cool. I guess that is no longer their sentiment or thought since roughly 1/2 of their published books each year are adventures!

What’s the source on that received wisdom? WotC publish a number of great adventures in the 3.x era. Forge of Fury, Red Hand of Doom are still favorites of many people.

Yeah. I voted for Psion in that poll. I do think it should be a class. That said, if all I get in 5e is subclass versions of that, I‘ll be fine and still able to play Psion with the various subclasses (assuming those see print at some point).

Bardiche 10 Fauchard 5-2=3 Glaive 12+1=13 Halberd 12 Lochaber Axe 10

They haven’t “turned psionics into wizardry” they have release a play test for people to evaluate. Not sure what “player directed books” means? People want adventures. So them publishing adventures is a bad thing? As to crafting rules... there are multiple versions of those rules and...

Dukkoti saw one of the archers down near him and ran for the body and the bow. He slid down next to the body using it as a shield. move 30', action: dash 30', slide prone in the sand next to the body of the fallen archer. Free object - grab the bow

Bardiche 8 Fauchard 13 Glaive 18+1=19 Halberd 12 Lochaber Axe 14 Lucern Hammer 3-2=1

This just made me immediately think of the Roc entry from 3.5's MM 1