Search results

Yeah, even the Scribe Scroll feat that was floating about in the play tests has not made it to the PHB.

What I have been doing for 3.5 > 5e Ability Scores is taking the score if less than 11. If over 11, the sore becomes 10 + the Ability Modifier. It gives it a nicer curve and means that creature Strength makes more sense in relation to Giants.

I see were you are coming from, but I always found that it really slowed down combat as standard rule. I think its a lot similar if being able to hit creatures before they reach you either requires Readying an Action or a special ability/feat.

To be honest, I would probably re-build the character from scratch using the 5e rules and then see if there is anything that seems obviously missing/wrong/odd. In general the 5e rules tend to build characters in big blocks. Class, Sub-Class, Background, Mega-Feats. Rather than having to work...

You may be overestimating how much thought the designers put into it. Its a big room, its contains *rolls 4d6* 19 Hobgoblins...

5e so far seems a lot more flexable in how to build a concept though, due to backgrounds. You can play an acceptable Fighter/Thief just by playing a Fighter with the Criminal background, no need to even multiclass which is a big step up. Another advantage in character generation is you don't...

Possibly. I would want to see it in three dimensions to be honest, I think the curly bits are actually coming out and pointing towards us rather than being flat. Which is unusual, but I am pretty sure I have seen something similar.

I actually think the Fighter with its semi-sub-class Fighting Styles at level 1 and the Warlock with its semi-sub-class patron type at level 1 are odder. Although the closed play test Ranger was the oddest of the lot. Semi-sub-class Favored Enemy at level 1, semi-sub-class Fighting Styles at...

People have the forum set so this is page 19 rather than page 7??? /Pagequit

Only as odd as the Cleric. ;o)

I spend a lot of time wandering around armouries, and I think all of those (apart from perhaps the double bladed axe) would fit in a actual weapon collection without looking out-of-place.

They basically get one more Cantrip than a Wizard/Cleric. As far as I am aware, no class can learn extra cantrips above and beyond that*. You cannot convert 'spells' into cantrips, they are not quite the same thing. *apart from by being a High elf, although there also may well be a feat to do it.

Other colours for feather boas will be in the DMG.

The only issue is that as a Great Sword is two handed, technically you cannot cast Somantic spells in combat. Its not a huge issue (and there may be a work around) but its something to be aware of when making your spell selection.

Sexy 'near transparent' servants. I mean, there may be a market for that... well there almost certainly is a niche market for that... Why am I even having this conversation?

Yes, it's gone. Basically they did not want a cantrip that every spell-caster would have to take.

Hey, no problem. I am very much just putting ideas down on paper (well you know what I mean) to see if they 'look right'. Its very hard to say anything concrete one way or the other right now.

You can not really start discussing rumours and then tell people you are not interested in the largest source of all the rumours right now.

Actually, thinking about it, 5e already has a mechanism for ignoring AC: Astral Claws: The astral searcher chooses one creature within 10 feet of it that it can see. The target must succeed on a DC 12 Charisma saving throw against this magic or take 7 (1d8+2) psychic damage. Additionally, the...

They also got rid of the Intoxicated condition.