Search results

You may have misunderstood that response. All you were told was that the Battle Sorceror hasn't been approved -- not that it wouldn't be. No house rule is considered until someone makes a proposal in the LEW forum. The Battle Sorceror hasn't been proposed, and therefore hasn't been considered...

Let me help you out with that. I'm one of the character judges, so eventually I'll be looking it over anyway. Let's add two numbers after each of these. The first is the ability modifier, which is the form in which an ability score is usually used, and will help fill in the rest of the sheet...

As judge, I approve the XP awards. I also grant Boddynock 8 DM credits, from August 2007 to April 2008.

As Kona'i is waiting for the bartender, a barmaid realizes that he doesn't know why he's waiting. She approaches the newcomer and whispers, "Introduce yourself to Joe and to the crowd present. As soon as you do that, he'll serve you."

... which prompts a question about the future of the game. Since the first week of June, only two players, plus the DM, have posted at all -- and those only sporadically, usually after long waits. Is this game worth continuing? Do any PCs other than Tor and Nurlan have players still following...

I agree. We're all way behind in character approvals. BTW, DMs: for the time being, don't worry about withholding XP from characters who haven't been approved at their current level. Chances are that it isn't the player that's holding things up, and we've generally had no trouble waiving that...

word from thegreyman! I finally got a reply from thegreyman: Assuming that he misread his calendar and is in fact referring to this month (probably intending Monday 25th/Tuesday 26th), I think it'd be best to let him keep the game, assuming he can keep it up. It's a nicely conceived...

"And yet, if this spot does know rainfall uncharacteristic to these lands, then there is that much truth in the tale. Whether the legend describes the true origins of that anomaly, or it arose from some desertfolk's attempt to explain the mysterious, or some poet's wish to imbue a geographical...

Since the judge spot for this adventure was never filled, I just stepped into it. Now, in my capacity as judge for this adventure, I appoint covaithe substitute DM.

From Logic 101? That's funny; logicians conventionally you "or" inclusively, specifying the exclusive or if we need it. Common usage, however, is ambiguous.

Even by the strictest construction of responsibility, Belkar has already been responsible for the death of one of the creatures listed in his question, namely the oracle. So, I don't seen any interpretation by which the prediction has *not* been fulfilled. But that's Belkar's prophecy. fba827...

Am I correct that Bizarre Bazaar doesn't have a judge? I posted about it in the game thread to get clarification. Assuming that is correct (did nobody notice there wasn't a judge?) then someone needs to step in. I'm overextended, so I'm not volunteering. However, if anyone in LEW (except the...

I noticed the following while browsing a Shop thread: ... so I poked my head in here to see. Does this adventure have a judge? It seems not -- at least, there's none listed. Ordinarily, it'd be the judge's responsibility to step in and (hopefully) take over, or else (failing all else) wrap the...

Nurlan replies "Fascinating. It is legends like that that make every place I travel unique."

Story? It's a performance of song that he promised -- his specialty. Of course, there's always a little banter between songs, but the meat of his performance is always music. As those interested in hearing his songs gather, Nurlan pulls out the purple cloak he likes to wear when on a stage of...

I'm way behind on LEW stuff. I was away for almost a month, during which time I wasn't online nearly as often as usual, and when I did get online ENworld wasn't a priority for me. Since returning, I've looked at a couple of characters, more or less randomly. So yeah, there are a lot more I...

I agree.

Nurlan answers: "We did fit into my tent to wait it out, and set up canvases for further protection. We were fortunate it did not strike while we were asleep, for I do not believe we could crowd in the tent while sleeping."

The posting dates are irrelevant, since the posts were all originally made as placeholders. It's the editing dates that tell you when content was added. Although, now that I look at it, I realize how little we've actually put there. I'm not sure how you get that number -- I see followup #371...

The posting dates are irrelevant, since the posts were all originally made as placeholders. It's the editing dates that tell you when content was added. Although, now that I look at it, I realize how little we've actually put there. I'm not sure how you get that number -- I see followup #371...