Search results

I am not sure, but 2E, the FR monster book I think.

I am gonna keep playing 4e until 5e makes the stores. If I like it, I will switch, if not, I will keep playing 4e. While I cant speak for anyone but myself, I think that most people have made their minds up by now, just as I have. Either you like 4e or you like Pathfinder or you like both. I...

You misunderstood. He saw two messages on twitter. The first by Cook told us that his dwarf had just critter a Lurker that had swallowed the paladin, then a later message told us that the paladin was unconscious. This short message was brought to you by Tapatalk and my iPad

Seriously? I know you are new here, but honestly, it's already getting old. If you have so little faith in WotC and how they are doing things, why do you spend so much time in this section, posting about a lot of subjects? Hmm, come to think of it, maybe YOU are the undercover spy from [rival...

Its called Rainbow Ice in my country! This short message was brought to you by Tapatalk and my iPad

Seriously? You might want to read up on the history of DND. This short message was brought to you by Tapatalk and my iPad

Thanks. I can see the post has been edited after I read it. Maybe it was added in ;) This short message was brought to you by Tapatalk and my iPad

Over 700 hours DMing in 4e, and on average, a character is down every single fight rolling death saves, and on average, a character dies every 3rd or 4th level. More than 7 or 8 TPK's. And my monsters all have -15% hit points and since MM3 damage guidelines, I rarely go above n+2 fiights, and...

Sorry, forgot quote from this article

Yes, it has been answered.

Could you enlighten me?

Not to mention the fact that you have played the Alpha/Beta/whatever version. Right? This short message was brought to you by Tapatalk and my iPad

the only visit you will get from WotC is from their edition ninjas who will come to burn your books, if you do not switch to 5e. But you already knew that ;) This short message was brought to you by Tapatalk and my iPad

Its not like they are asking the people on the forums to design the damn thing. If you want to participate, you need to sign up for the play-test. You can't in good faith expect that WotC reads every single post on every single board around the net. As for that, with exposure on CNN, Forbes...

Fact: Most 4e players never get to epic tier. So if you piss off a lot of players by not including epic in core, I doubt it is because they are 4e players. Anyway, I am a bit torn. On one hand I would like access to "the whole game" from the beginning (say if my campaign that I want to convert...

Assuming only the 4 classic classes (fighter, thief, cleric, mage). How about a system, that makes you chose a primary multi-class when you multi-class. Meaning you can be both a fighter-thief (thug) and a thief-fighter (assassin?) or a fighter-cleric (paladin) and cleric-fighter (warpriest)...

Why would 4e players not have experienced this? Most 4e players on this board have played at least 2-3 editions of DND before 4e. We have all tried to "lose" support for the edition we are playing. And probably more than once or twice.

I vote #1. But what I think is that each class should fill 1 role - at the time. But each class should be flexible enough to fill different roles. Not just as the same time. For example: Fighter: Tank, striker Cleric: leader, controller Rogue: striker, tank Wizard: controller, striker. That's...

Yeah, this is all I want as well. War-priests would have more hit points and better weapons/armor, but could cast fewer spells. Oh, and spheres. That's something that has been missing since 2ed. But they need to be balanced somewhat, so that even if you optimize, you do not choose the same...

Gone through what?