Search results

Hah! You mean you are pro-speculation, it's an important part of getting people to come to and use your web-site? ;)

I think we just disagree on a fundamental level on just about everything. When you say WotC is lieing, it is, considering many of them are fellow posters, just as personal as my examples where I made up ridiculous stuff about Monte and Mearls. I also don't think your theory has anything to do...

First of all, my question from earlier still remains unanswered. Do you question all companies, or just WotC? Also, while it's healthy to have a certain amount of scepticism, it can be taken too far. I mean, if you don't believe anything they say, why even bother reading about it? How far do...

1. You had very little substantial arguments to support your "theory". 2. Your motives are interesting, because, according to your own theory, the perception of the online community is very important. And if you are right about that, why are you promoting a theory that makes WotC a bunch of...

So despite you saying that you weren't suggesting WotC was cheating with the numbers (in your first post), it seems to me that it is exactly what you ar saying. I wonder, do you have similar view towards Pathfinder's 50k beta download claim, or is it just WotC that are subject to your theories?

Exclude it. Only rabid anti-WotC trolls would even consider that they (WotC) would engage in such cheating - and for what?

I doubt that WotC will drop the current DDI just because 5e comes out. They know that making a new edition loses them customers, because they stay with the old edition. By keeping the DDI up and running, they might lose some more, but they also ensure a steady revenue from those players...

For example, in our group of 6, only I have ever logged in to the Community section at WotC.

Okay, sorry about first post. Came off quite a bit more snarky than intended. But I must admit that Kzach and RW go against everything I want in 5e. delericho on the other hand, hits much closer to home. If we go from 4e as a base, feats should only give out typed bonuses or abilities that are...

I just wanted to chip in and say that I am glad none of you are designing 5e.

Yeah, thanks for all the handy lists and links!

How did you export it and inserted it into your post?

I doubt they would be bringing in Monte Cook if 5e was anywhere near completion.

Wow, I really hope the OMB can export as a picture, just like the original MB.

Did you fail your sarcasm check? No way TerraDave doesn't know who the Zhents are ;)

Pfft, Fzoul is like my favorite FR NPC! (I know, it's shallow, but I can't help loving that ginger bastard)

Indeed. I have already made a whole new campaign, based on the area, in a world of my own. Very easy. Now all I need to do is wait for my players to TPK ;)

There are several ways to deal with inexperienced players starting at paragon. One way is not to start them at paragon. You could for example run 3 sessions (at lvl 3, 6 and 9 for example) where they get to know their characters. Perhaps in flash-backs (since they are level 11 at the real...

Considering the baseline for the tiers in 4e, Paragon level sounds the most suited, and in that case, I would start them at level 11, for the most well-rounded experience. While I understand the desire of scaling a campaign by the players' level, I have tried it, and it made for (warning...

Hmm, no vote function on Taptalk, but I have a special place in my heart for ghouls, trolls, mindflayers and most of all dragons