Search results

I really like this. Gonna steal that approach for my campaign world. Thanks.

Done. Hope you get enough. Cheers

I like that we will be able to create monsters both from the ground up AND by using templates.

I think that no matter the success of Next, there will be people on ENworld that will claim it is a failure. An the opposite. With that said, I voted success, because (based on the playtest) it looks like Next will be an edition that my players and I will enjoy playing. So whether it will last...

I agree. That was kinda a train-wreck of a session. The woman seemed off, the story was forced and Perkins cheated with the dice, disregarded the rules, seemed unprepared and for what? And I am not even gonna mention the giant robot.

Based on the last 9 years of play, which have been chronicled, 15 hours per level is the average. Personally, I would rather spend about 25-30 hours between dings, but 15 hours is the sweet-spot for my players, so...

While I do agree it is the probably the wrong way to handle an edition war (deleting the thread), I think you are reading way too much into things. But if it was WoTC high-ups who ordered a thread to be deleted, I am okay with it. It's their forums, why should they allow excessive bad-mouthing...

Yes, because if ENworld did the same, you would have zero posts the last year, so that makes sense.

As of 4e, WotC's books were still being printed in the US, at least according to posts made by Mr. Scott Rouse. WotC might have changed that since though, but if that is the case, I missed the memo.

Considering it will cost at least 70 dollars (or rather the equivalent) in Denmark, sure!

If those numbers match up (haven't checked) it's very easy indeed.

1) Nope 2) Probably Speaking of monster-crunch, has anyone done some work on the playtest monsters? A bit pressed for time these days, so if someone has already done it...

I like it! Thanks for doing this. Will use it for my next campaign starting on Tuesday, then come back and hit you with some feedback. Cheers

According to the Read First-doc, the crits rule has changed, but in the How To Play-doc, it seems they forgot to change it from the last version (no maxed out die, add one die). Anyone heard or read anything about this?

Yeah, I asked if he could be more specific about the when, but no luck so far. Was really hoping for this weekend, as my players TPK'ed last week and they all agreed to try out DnDNext for my next campaign.

Well maybe I am just old as you insinuate. But in a world of awesome 3D trailers for games, I find it very hard to believe that anyone outside the biggest Paizo fans will be impressed by this trailer. Don't get me wrong, I like the art on it's own, but not the advanced slideshow.

Worst thing (hyperbole) I ever saw. A company made this? Must admit I am shocked that 1) someone got paid 2) the good folks at Paizo, who usually have good taste, approved of this.

Except they said 2014 ;)

I stopped playtesting. Can't fit both playtesting and the regular campaign into the schedule, and my players prefer to play a system that doesn't change every 2 months. Still planning on switching to Next once it is more stable or out. So far, I like it better than the other editions - at least...

Any particular reason as to why the results are hidden?