Search results

Love it!

It's getting to the point that I'm giving up checking the GITP website now. Updates are so few and far between that I completely lose track of what is happening. I'll come back to him in a year and see how much catching up I have to do at that point!

I'm really enjoying this Capaldi Doctor. I find his nature interesting and charming in its irascibility (reminiscent of Hartnell). A complete contrast in my mind to Colin Baker whose doctor was so annoyingly horrible without redeeming features that it drove me away from doctor who!

But, but, but, it totally steals the Rogues schtick again! < / tongue in cheek >

I second this suggestion.

Shame they made the class so uninspiring in 5e then :( grumble, mutter, get off my lawn! etc

It would be nice if it had been a little bit more factually accurate on the Ranger though! "...good with ranged weapons where the fighter is a melee expert. " Can't see that before 3e at all. " The ability to cast spells only appeared with AD&D (1977-1979)." Completely wrong - the Strategic...

I'm afraid I'm with Diaglo here - that is how it is described in Greyhawk supplement 1, but I believe that in the original white box it created and fired a magic arrow that was +1 to hit and damage. At that point all weapons did 1d6, so it was +1 to hit for 2-7 damage. Nobody ever took it in...

My favourite use of magic missile hinged on the fact that it could damage things on the ethereal plane, but not from the ethereal plane. So there was a misty part of the dungeon which silently transitioned the adventurers onto the ethereal, and they came across the wizard guards with see...

I've deleted a bunch of posts which are speculating about 'spamming' or 'trolling'. If you have real cause to think it is going on then report the post to the moderators. Otherwise, please don't attempt low key bullying by attributing motives to other posters - you know nothing of their age...

Falcon, you haven't replied to the post by pkt77242 yet. Have you read the Players Handbook for 5e? Have you read the free PDF of the rules? Knowing what you have got up to will help people judge how to answer your question better. Thanks

He never said it was - he was referring to the hobbit movies as a whole deviating from the text.

Unlike most people here (apparently!) I loved this episode. I thought it was the best Capaldi episode yet and one of the best Dr Who episodes I've seen in years. I love the fact that the Doctor is in control the whole time - he engineers the whole thing (including getting his memory wiped so...

Really liked the first half, really put off by the end. I'm getting tired of Clara turning up at all kinds of significant points in the doctors life and manipulating him. It robs him of all agency, and I can't see why they would do that for the main protagonist. I'm really liking the Capaldi...

Incredibly cool. Thanks for bringing it to my attention!

I seem to remember that magic weapons only did damage equal to the '+' of the weapon, lightning bolts did 1pt damage per die and so forth. They were almost unkillable! I don't like the idea of them being mind flayer doggies though. I prefer to have them with their own intellect, plans and so...

Good catch, this was my brain on stupid!

I feel that the real problem isn't about DPR or anything similar. It is just that the class doesn't really have that "wow, play me!" factor. Not enough interesting choices or flavour IMO.

If you can't reply without snark, you're going to be taking a short holiday from ENworld. Be warned!

Really difficult with so many great choices! Although I normally gravitate towards arcanists, I think in this instance I'd like to play a raging barbarian who has been reflavoured to be a ranger (the 'rage' is actually 'intense focus'). Sorcerer would normally be a top choice for me, but I...