Search results

the shields and armored trait seem different from what's in the book and the starship builder. are those mistakes or changes coming with the proofread release?

there  is, but with no mechanical support for any of it, it'll either feel disjointed or else could just be equally applicable to humans imo. that, and if i didn't want race to play a part in how my character plays, i would not be playing dnd.

yeah, ditto.

if i remember right, the stealthy property is listed under customizing weapons/armor and not the actual weapon properties. as for mounted in the VRC, that's defined in the appendix for weapon augments (it basically lets you ignore a weapon's heavy property if you use a...i think bonus...

i don't see any future campaigns i'll be playing in. that said, assuming we're not talking about o5e, probably human (i find o5e humans awfully boring from a mechanical perspective). i'm technically playing one in my pf2e campaign, but that's only because of how half-elves work in that system...

WHAT THE **** IS A KILOMETEEEEER

[PF2eR, custom setting] Half the party's under arrest!

politics is temporary. the cosmos are forever.

ah, i see.

i'm pretty sure that if you get the physicals you also get the PDFs.

hope you have fun!

"God made man, but Sam Colt made him equal", as the saying goes. ...well, okay, usually it's "them" and not "him", but i just think that "him" flows better, okay? i mean...no reason it can't in d&d. but that'd be more class features and feats then proficiency anyway.

"robots, robots, constructs, or robots" sounds like a song name

wait a second...there's a radiation storm exploration challenge? welp, you know what that means...

alternatively: "WHY ARE YOU BUYING LEMURES AT THE SOUP STORE" "**** YOU"

163?

uh...no, he didn't (unless i missed a post). what he said was: that is not the same statement. i'm not arguing it isn't coercive - i'm arguing it's not gaslighting (by default, anyway - a roll20 dm saying something like that is almost definitely gaslighting). and actually, looking back at...

but seriously, casters will be fine. you can chill out.

the passenger ships starting at a certain grade get a feature that gives them additional luxury decks for every passenger deck that states those luxury decks don't count against the ship's deck limit, so yeah, i assume there's restrictions on things.

...that's not gaslighting being described, though. gaslighting is making someone believe certain events happened differently to how they actually happened. what's being described is more invoking the fear of missing out then anything else.