Search results

Right.

Whoa. It is my understanding the the divine challenge is applied each and every round until it is broken-off by the character not attacking or being adjacent to the target. A real paladin can then invoke a new challenge, but our tiefling mutliclassed character can't. If this is not the case...

The warlock is focused on moving a lot, teleporting to here and there, cloaking himself with concealment as he moves, and so on. So the result is that he generally isn't where he was when he cast his eyebite on the poor target. However, you'all convinced me there are reasonable ways to handle...

I have a Tiefling character in my group, a warlock multiclassing into paladin. He took the eyebite power, and uses it (as well as hiding) with his Divine Challenge. The result is that the target can't hit him or even approach towards him since it doesn't know where he is, so it takes the full (8...

Pretty please? Game starts in an hour...

I am not sure if that is possible under the OGL. On the surface, you may simply claim not to be distributing any original OGC. However, you are NOT simply copying someone's OGC. The work involves editing, abridgment, changing words, and so on. It falls under Derivative Material (1b) of the...

Dear man, if you do that there won't be virtually anyone left. Where is the fun in that? ;)

I think you won. Kudos. Wulf: free products can be published immediately.

What?! Interweb discussions not constructive? Inconcievable!

I would have thought so, but apparently people that acutally know what they're talking about (like Orcus) don't, and that's a pretty strong indication that this isn't the case.

But... it's fun!

Yes. Isn't the OGL grand? :D The part designated as Open Game Content in the "work" Grandwiki published, i.e. the webpage (or the pdf document if my recommendation somehow, miracolously, fiies through). Even if they just copied it down. You allowed them to copy (USE) it and thereby claim...

If you enter the entry, of course you can put your copyright notice there. If someone else does, he has to put yours but he also HAS to put his. That's just the way the OGL works. In general, I think a line saying "Grandwiki" is best so as not to meddle with each particular volunteer's name. Of...

I see several problems with the template. Assuming that the idea is to publish OGC directly to the wiki (which I object to, as mentioned above and in the Yahoo Group - I prefer to attach OGC files, each published under its own OGL), I would suggest the following template instead: [TEMPLATE]...

Aren't such clauses formally part of the process of terminating the contract? So that both sides are still are under the contract throughout the period in question? (And both sides have to benefit for a contract to be valid, so some compensation would be required?) Regardless, yeah - a limited...

I think WotC wouldn't mind if a publishing company was constructed to publish GSL-compliant materials AS LONG AS the parent company didn't publish the corresponding material as OGL at the same time. As an escape strategy for the time when the GSL is rescinded, I think that's a reasonable...

Or converted to OGL products.

Whether the OGL was a failure or not could only be established in the few years to come. If its use continues and grows without WotC's support than it was a success. If its use stagnates and is limited to a few niche games, played by a small part of the gaming community (and practically anything...

The only relevant pieces I got from these were: "Intent to sow confusion is also relevant; hence, the general rule that no more of the trademark should be used than necessary for the legitimate purpose. For instance, use of a word mark is preferred to a logo, and a word mark in the same style...

The thing that amazes me is that they say that if you play with the new toy, you can't ever play with the old toy ever again, even if you break up with them entirely. I didn't think such a restriction was even possible. Good to know. Personally, I think if you're gonna release things to the...