Search results

Hoody Hoo you lucky sumgun. Keep us posted. My group and I just recently started a couple of 2e games and we're loving it.

Ya know Belen, Your opinion is your own and while I agree that Kalamar wasn't my cup 'o tea, a lot of people liked it enough to buy it.

1st edition Dragonlance. Two Irda's. One a Wizard of High Sorcery the other a Cavalier. Both went to 18th level which was the max in 1e Dragonlance. It took me two solid years of at least three sessions a week to get them there but what a ride.

bump

My very first 3.0 character was a dwarven paladin with a greatsword. Man what fun we had with just those three new core books.

The funnest time I had running 3.x was when 3.0 released in 2000. We were playing core 3 only. So that's what I suggest. Just limit to 3.5 core three.

I say go back to 2e. It worked for me and my group. Even after six years of d20 going back to 2e was easy. With the core rules 2.0 and expansion disks I am ready to create years of fun. I agree with you on the emphasis of new rules over story and setting. I thought about C&C as well but since I...

If it's possible could I get a mod to email me so that I could change my user ID? Thanks.

I voted other meaning let them go sweetly into that good night.

I did exactly this going back to 2e and RC. I ended up eBaying by core books because I realized we'd never go back. My son has my old 3.0 core books and if for some unseen reason I want to play(not run) 3.x again I've got the SRD and the 3.0 core rules to do it. But I really don't see that...

I'd just like to add a QFT to this reply. As one who came from earlier editions of the game to 3.x I found it just wasn't D&D and fun for me and my group. We had the advantage to go back to an earlier system. I worry for newer players that didn't have that opportunity and if they find out 3.x is...

Core Rules 2.0 and Expansion CD ROMs

Rules Cyclopedia Core Rules CD-ROM 2.0 plus Expansion CD

We went back to 2e and Rules Cyclopedia because we know them like the back of our hand. I hated DMing 3.x but as many have said I'd play. But, really, 2e allows us to play the style of games we want. Something 3.x hasn't.

hong you rapscallion. Take a laugh point.

I think this is what will happen as well.

Nope, there's nothing of medieval in 3.5 anymore. My opinion and all of course.

He is still a paladin of his deity.

Agreed! He's chaotic lets move it along. Pick neutral or evil to go along with it and lets go.

I love this thread. It asks for stats on Jack and co. and it desolves into a debate on alignment.