Search results

double post.

Heh. You got us on that one. ;) We don't intend to alter the either/or nature of the GSL. I mean, if we open up that point again for internal debate it'll take another six months to get everyone in agreement on the best approach. We understand the impacts this license will have on the 3pps...

Edited out. My apologies to ByronD for gut-reaction posting. You're right in that it is OK for you to be mad. The part about our blatant attempt got under my skin. Now you know what buttons to hit with me!

In my best impression of Phil Hartman doing an impression of Ed McMahon: You, sir, are correct.

Correct. One or the Other. I think it's pretty publisher-friendly that we have a GSL period! :cool: No one can print 4E books before the GSL is released.

No. That is not what I was trying to say. I'll try to reword it so it is a little clearer: Publishers can put out a product under the OGL - OR - they can put out a product under a 4E GSL. 3.x or 4E Not both. One or t'other. By "mutual exclusivity" I mean, different versions of the same...

I hope you don't mind me taking this POV, but this statement: Is not congruent with this one: We've spent quite a bit of time contemplating the licenses, working out the corner cases, and identifying any possible legal concerns.

Yes, that is what I was trying to convey. We totally recognize that this mutual exclusivity will keep some publishers from joining us in 4E. That's a business decision they need to make, and we respect that.

It does mean that you can not produce the same product in different versions. I might end up saying this a lot over the next few days/weeks/months: We are absolutely confident in 4E - to the point that we are only producing 4e products ourselves from here on out.

No. We've designed the licenses to be mutually exclusive.

yup! yup!

The October 1st date applies to all 3PPs publishing under the D&D 4E GSL, including those that are getting early access. The date is completely unrelated to GenCon.

this

you know it!

That wasn't accidental :o

None! She's meant to be in action, about to fall backwards - see the cover of Book of Challenges for the whole piece. When I was posing for it Lockwood said, "Hope you ski because after holding this 'I'm going to fall backwards' pose for 20 minutes your legs are going to burn!"

It's like lin-AY or LeNez if you're french. However, I respond to almost any ladies' name that starts with an L, including Lidda. In college a drunk guy called me Lemonade...that followed me for the rest of my schooling.

...still nothing to share... I'm thinking of a blog: Day 1137 on the OGL saga: still nothing to share Day 1138 on the OGL saga: still nothing to share Day 1139 on the OGL saga: still nothing to share Day 1140 on the OGL saga: i thought there might be something but then i realized it was my own...

What you said! Plus, it seems like my posts are usually thread-enders. It's in my best interest to watch the debates (both pro- and anti-WotC) so I can keep a pulse on the community. I don't want to be the cause for a discussion to cease. A thousand apologies for not having additional...

Le Rouse And what of the Rouse-tabout?