Search results

Nested Arrays have been discussed before but I think it is worth having a formal position so: Proposal: Nested Arrays are not permitted in Living Supers. Nested Arrays are where a power within an array is itself an array. I believe that nesting arrays is legal according to the RAW but it can...

I tend to agree with the argument that a 1 point feat is enough for this effect, I just think that calling it an AP confuses the issue. SK actually suggested that the 1 point feat would give partial protection against disarm but the autofire part would still be lost, not that I think that is...

YES I think this was in by the back door anyway as approved characters are already making use of it. Its no more abusable than a lot of other things.

I tend to think that sort of thing (need to perform a dance etc) can already be covered with either a powerloss drawback or a complication. I agree there are many genre cases where it is appropriate, I just think the abuse potential is too high and there are other routes available for the same...

I'm not sure this agreeing to be a Judge was such a good idea. It reminds me of my time playing Nomic but maybe that is just because there are so many proposals at the moment. :> Could someone remind me what the rules for acceptance of a proposal are? It looks like 3 yes votes is a pass but how...

Many people have taken Attractive though which is flawed by at least 50% quite possibly much more. People have also taken the Physical/Energy only flaw as well which is also 50%. The problem is that it can be a huge synergy bonus, if the magician in the example above was going to max his skill...

This is slightly different I think. If the PL 8 has been on three missions and then the player decides to upgrade them to 10 they will keep all their earned PP: if they retire and resubmit they will not. (Also retirement and resubmission is different from an RP standpoint. If you just up grade...

YES It's an official errata. and a ruling that makes sense. No point in taking 10 ranks of shapeshift just to be able to get claws and strike 10. I am not sure if this proposal even needed voting on since Bront says it is the rules already.

YES Flawed Shapeshift - I would be doubtful about people taking huge ranks in this but I am doubtful about people taking huge ranks in shapesift so no problem with this power.

CORE BOOK - Lose ranks not PP I actually think the UP rule is fairer, but counting PP is annoying and it is better to go core where possible, saves everyone needing to buy UP, or remember lots of house rules.

NO I just don't like this. It seems way to abusable to me, if you max the skill it is a good example of a flaw which has no downside, (Which are explicitly excluded as non-flaws in the rules) If you don't max the skill then it is either completely terrible or you might as well just take the...

NO I like the idea, and I think it would be useful for NPCs but the lack of need to put more than one rank in a power is just too good. Sorry.

YES I can't see anything contentious here. Bounce this one to the top as its not on the list of proposals in general discussion

Yes Since H4H's only problem seems to be that you can do this anyway and I have no real problem aproving content which clarifies things which are already legal but obscure. All yeses so far, but that is because I am putting the harder ones to the bottom of my list to think about further.

Yes

Are all the challenges defined or are they just GM imposed modifiers, I am guessing they are defined so would we need to list them all somewhere so they could be looked up? The advantages of the feats seems to be that you could stunt for one, if you know that you are going to be disabling a...

I should vote no just to be contrary but YES

I vote yes on this. It seemed like a cool idea when I first read it. I've not seen any bad reviews and all the effects look good to me, (encouraged descriptions, less need for everyone to take trade off feats, etc) The main down side I see is that it is very definitely a house rule it’s not...

Personally I don't see the point in this. (at least for attack/dc) if you want a +10/-10 trade off you can just take +5/-5 and use the power attack feat all the time to bump it up further. That said 20 points of impervious toughness would just be annoying, so I will vote yes. Either to +5/-5...

See my post :> Broken link :< but the fact you posted one suggests there is stuff to find so i will go looking. (My computer room has just be taken apart for decorating so I can only post from work which means no books. For now. Taking out a brightly coloured A4 hard back is just a little to...