Search results

Problem is if there isn't enough work to keep two or more people busy a lot of companies cut down to one and it's great till that guy goes on vacation or get's a new job. Pretty common situation in IT at least.

are you really trying to tell me most 1st ed, 2nd ed and 3rd ed players are playing on roll 20? I'm not sure you made any point or actually said anything with this. except that there are still measurable percentages of of pre internet versions of D&D being played on a website. Which doesn't...

still a lot of interest in 1st edition, 2nd edition, and 3rd edition. I think most people that play just play what they started with or liked most. Not sure changing the rules does anything but fragment the player base even more.

For dungeon crawls and similar games I imagine they kick ass.

No arguments there. I find VTT to add very little to the game and takes a lot more time to prep.

yeah, I don't often rewatch anything and i've watched those movies at least 4 times. The hobbit got once If I ever watch it again it'll be with grandkids or something that's the only way i can see that happening.

My original point was they'd be better off focusing on making money with media and just locking the rules down like all the other HASBRO games. Then in a few years they could release D&D Modern edition, or D&D Cyberpunk edition, just like they do with monopoly. Just enough here and there...

I never said desire to be dependent of third-party website. I said ability to have content offline when said website inevitably doesn't work. D&D paper just works. it better be the same online or no dollars get spent.

if my self underwater immolation made my point then /Bow

I don't think LOTR is perfect but I think it's closer to the source material than i ever thought anyone would be able to do for technical and movie production reasons. I do agree the later scenes, for me it's how they minimize Gandalf the white spending weeks fending off the Nazgul and make it...

what they need is the ability to add customized abilities so that DM can create custom abilities and make them available to the characters.

but can he burn the city underwater? Scientifically the answer is an unqualified yes, but still not a good image to try and sell to an audience that I'm going to Burn the underwater city......Gotta go 100% in with Deset on this one.

still you have to admit bury his kingdom under the sea would have made it look more like the writers, could you know, think....

And sales showed it. But it wasn't a total failure and for the first time a D&D move didn't shut down all chance of a sequel just by existing.

Problem is everyone who cares has had this discussion multiple times over the last many years and you probably aren't going to get more than a few pages before we start drifting in other directions.

wow I hadn't seen that one. Did AI write that script? (just kidding.). to be fair after watching all of them for a long time I'm at least 5 or 6 movies behind at this point. I'm sure Ill rent them at some point but Just haven't been motivated to watch any of the superhero movies for awhile.

or 20 minute chase scene's that make you feel like an hour has passed and add nothing to the plot?

no it would be smart. If they could make thier VTT popular enough then every third party that wanted to make VTT modules to sell would need to go through them as the most reliable source of fans to purchase them. key being it has to just work and they have to spend the resources to get...

every one of those things turned off a group of fans.

As long as i can download the content to my device, Fine. But no to being locked into an online tool that won't run offline.