Search results

Well they definitely made it thematic and not OP. Seems possibly a bit weak and still has the turns / aoe issues. I don’t view it as a solution to the problem presented. But it is interesting and fun!

Again not what they want. You’re demonstrating this is an intractable problem.

That’s easy, they want to control 10 skeletons a turn entailing everything said 10 skeletons might do. Thus the intractable problem. You aren’t giving them what they want. You are demanding they give up on getting what they want in the name of gameplay.

Then you aren’t giving them what they want. Thus the intractable problem.

I am 100% certain. There was plenty of pushback on those other spell changes as well.

I asked Microsoft copilot for an image of a werewolf but it refused. When asked why it said too many werewolf images were from copyrighted work.

Problem: Necromancer fans want many permanent minions but many permanent minions makes for poor ttrpg gameplay for many reasons. Slow turns and aoe being the most notable. There is no solution here. You either give Necromancer fans what they want or you keep the gameplay good.

And it will only improve. See the internet 30 years ago vs now.

I trust fully that you are recounting what you heard accurately. I’ve also seen many people do similar with the infamous McDonald’s hot coffee case, but that was a lot more nuanced than the average Joe realizes. That McDonald’s way overheated the coffee beyond mcdonalds own recommendations...

If that’s a true and complete summary, then this is a prime example of why people don’t trust the legal system.

Do you think AI wasn’t tested at all? Or just not to your personal satisfaction?

Sure and I 100% agree but also pre live testing only ever goes so far.

Okay. So no relevant additions to the discussion. We are at an impasse. My suggestion is that there is no great way to test ai outside of a live environment. Your suggestion is that there must be a good way but that you cannot comment on what it might be due to lack of expertise. There’s...

I see. That wasn’t my understanding of that.

Obviously. That doesn’t answer the meat of the question of how you do that in the legal domain. Nor of what standards denote a pass vs a fail. Etc. The broader point is sometimes testing can only be achieved in live environments as opposed to testing environments.

You mean it doesn’t still do that ;)

Sure. I can agree that they should be tested. Do we all agree with that? Because I get the vibes that some want AI taken out back with a shotgun and put out of its misery. The next question is how do you test them?

Is that what was actually done. Or was it just a single 15 minute segment at any time of the day for 365 days?

Okay going back to the moral line part of the definition of narrativist. Does character safety vs character ambition form a moral line?

Exactly. Thanks for the better examples.