Search results

Which of the guys in that picture is a member of a bipedal race descended from dragons? I fail to see how that answers my question at all. Is the only requirement to "prove" that Dragonborn are video game inspired the existence of some sort of lizardman in a video game and series that I...

They could number the classes and the feats for all I care. I want the system to be strong and I could not possibly care less about the names. We don't use build information (class, feats, etc.) at my table anyway. I hope all the spell shaping spells will have the Golden Wyvern prefix...

Kheti : The whole system is based on at will/per encounter/per day now, so if that's a deal breaker for you, you are probably out of luck.

I really don't care about the names, I care about how well the system runs. And dollars to donuts the Golden Wyvern lodge is going to make it easier for me to run the system, because I bet all of the spell shaping type feats are going to have the Golden Wyvern prefix, so it will be easier to...

The feat does not have a prerequisite of membership in any group, so I have now idea how you could come to the conclusion that its presence forces the existence of said group.

Why does magic become suddenly incomprehensible when it does two divergent things at once? It's magic. The possibilities of what it can do are literally boundless. Bishmon - The point is that Wizards is screwed either way. When people see things stripped of their trappings, such as the...

Given that the topic is dragonborn, would you be so kind as to tell me which videogame/manga they come from?

And I'm one of those people who doesn't imagine computer game influences where there are none.

I love it. The golden wyvern thread talks about how Wizards should strip everything down to the bare bones so it's universally applicable to all settings, and then this one where the cry goes out that by not sufficiently describing how smites work, something which could vary from setting to...

I ban things based on mechanical problems, not flavor issues, so given the info we have currently is entirely flavor, I voted allow.

Umm, don't you have to change the rules to be house ruling something? This is, after all, a name issue. Referring to the act of renaming things as "Houseruling" seems overdramatic.

Plus, since I'd put money on there being a chain, or at least a cluster of golden wyvern feats, golden wyvern can function as a useful prefix which sorts all feats that involve shaping and sculpting spells in one easy to find location in the feat list (increase range, increase area, increase...

I am, admittedly, functioning under the presumption that multiclassing will include no xp penalties, and that the situation will be similar to the one in SWSaga, where multiclassing for class features is commonplace and expected.

This rigidity could be a problem if you were restricted to one class. But you're not. So as long as you're not someone like the person described by Cadfan, who's more interested in the class written on your sheet than how close you can get to your character concept, you should be fine.

5 (the rest is just to meet length)

I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not, but swordsages can't do that. Most of the shadow hand stuff is supernatural.

So ENworld has finally stooped to this, a bunch of people berating the designers for trying new things. Blech.

But if you randomize wizards, the imbalances become even worse. Wizard A, who got all the good spells, is just as good as any wizard with an optimized spell list, and Wizard B, who got all the bad spells, is wretched. All the while denying the player the possibility to pursue spells which fit...

Lord Fyre - But I don't think that's where D&D should go. I stick to D&D because I like it's computer game like elements, i.e. the tactical side of things. The depth of the tactics is pretty much the only reason I play D&D. D&D doesn't have to compete with computer games directly, because it...

Driddle, could I convince you to respond to the question, rather than ignoring it to respond to petty minutia? Because I'm actually interested in your answer.