Search results

Elves are my favorite (though I prefer the name sidhe) and dwarves are a close second. I do not care for hobbits.

No. I use the Late Roman Empire as a model and there are no slaves. (Idealized, I know, but it is an exercise in fantasy after all!) There are probably coloni (tenant farmers) though.

If their Quintessential line is any indication, then please no. That would be akin to Battlefield Earth 2.

They are in my game. (They aren't Mithraists, though.)

Nothing. He is a cheap knockoff with a lousy name (like most FR gods).

As it should be. Even vanilla Kalamar got that one right.

I do not use the D&D pantheon (I've got my own: one good god and one evil one). However, I say keep the stench of FR out of core D&D. Also, I prefer Heironeous to Bahamut.

Eureka! Replace Warlord with Flock of Seagulls!

I do not care for the name "warlord," but I have come to agree with those who say just change the name in your game if you do not like it. If I use the class and 4th edition, I will come up with a campaign specific name just like I do with the other classes.

No thank you.

Is this an UK idiom thing?

I like the elf conjurer. The merchant guard is also nice.

What he said.

The stupid names are peculiar to D&D, but the concepts are not.

Please no.

I collect ToEE related stuff, so I would like to see a 4E version.

I second that LOL.

Incidentally, when are we going to see Bigby's Bitch Slap? Isn't it an obvious avenue?

I would have preferred the name Sidhe.

I welcome the demise of "yugoloth" as a distinct category of fiends. They should be made demons or devils, as appropriate.