Search results

I really don't see the issue, D&D is about doing what we want not what you at the corporation think we should do.

Well everyone kind of does this nowadays taking parts from one system and adding bits to another, i do it myself in my own games, adding stuff from not just D&D but other systems that have parts i like and interconnecting them together. I did this with the old d20 modern game, stripped it and...

Well someting that is not just a hack-and-tack-on like the level-up stuff, this seems like a better-quality book with some great ideas.

lol, sorry but I really think most have trust issues with D&D and Hasbro in general, there are so many great 3rd party games that are better in many ways. Actually if Hasbro had not tried to be so openly greedy many many would have never got the chance to show their stuff so thanks Hasbro for...

non

have to agree with the David Zaslav statement they seem to want to trash DC in general

i have had no issues with it, he is naming it like he has space X and such.

looks interesting, and some of the concepts appeal to my DM side in combining rules and systems

I really care not what the new books say or don't say, cannon is what i say it is as i am the DM of my world and settings. I for one hate the changes from sonic, electricity damage to thunder and lighting but that is fine i just reference them the other way in my games. Same for this if it...

This is the only product that even slightly interest to me to be honest, but still i have all my old Planescape stuff so really depends on the crunch factor if it is worth it or not.

funny D&D 40% off, didn't they increase their prices by around that much as well, lol.

no conversion is needed as i stated, ultramodern 5e: redux has a setting like this already done, and no need to learn a whole other rule system.

many things said in this, can be done with the current D&D 5e, but the risk is not as great or the detail lesser still as they have cut so much from the system to"streamline it" for the masses. You would have a better chance doing it with older rule systems of D&D like 3rd or later as back then...

again pathfinder team sticking it to wizards and Hasbro, lol one is in it for the love of the game and the community the other are corporate money grabber, lol. Way to go

I for one have a lower mental capacity than say Albert Einstein, and that doesn't bother me I still have an above average I. Q. as was tested before going into the military. As much as you and others want to believe, not everyone plays on the same level, and many of the more simple games do...

I have seen many similar games and really the information is covered in their statement, 50 page PDF, and it's a lightweight toolset which leans heavily on improvisation. Designed as a 'zero prep' game, it's best used for one-shots. So the pop music of the game industry in other words very...

I said no, and explained why, but I guess it might be a problem for some to understand my point of view that's fine. People need others who play checkers, I for one prefer more complex games, not those simplified for the masses.

No, I for one as a player love to figure out things and discover things and work within the rules to accomplish a task. If none of this is present then really I find no point in even participating in a game that really has no rules or that have rules that can change on a whim. As a GM i never...