Search results

I’m not privy to the terms of the contract.

This is a news site, and my job—literally my day job—is to report facts. I can’t agree with something which isn’t factually true. I’ll tell you what people say; I won’t tell you what they think. I also won’t tell people what you think. Trust me that that is feature not a bug.

Nah, we're now suddenly looking down the barrel of 50% tariffs on the EU. The world changes weekly on the whims of one man. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgr5xrygzk5o America is currently an unstable country and cannot be traded with. We used to have a short list of high risk countries...

My meaning was very clear. I said "People willing to do business with Nazis are just as likely to lie as the Nazis are" is not a provable statement. You appeared to interpret that as "Bob Bledsaw II is not a Nazi", which is not even similar to my meaning, and I can't see how it's possible to...

That's not what I said, is it? What you're replying to is my response to "People willing to do business with Nazis are just as likely to lie as the Nazis are." What you appear to think you're replying to is "Bob Bledsaw II is not a Nazi". Let's not get confused.

@Argyle King So in quick succession that's two people who have said you misrepresented them. As I've made clear, I feel you've been sealioning and misrepresenting all along, with your multiple requests that I post essays to explain my points, and your disingenuous twistings of other peoples'...

Come on. This is just nonsense. Unless you can back this up with facts, let's not just go into the 'because the word Nazi has been invoked by somebody we can just make anything up' paradigm. Let's stick to what what people have actually said or done. Otherwise, we're the bad guys too. We want to...

I saw the previous post before this, so—I retract my objection to your “see my previous post” comment. I recognise that you did reply to me. It is, however, not a coherent response and I have been unable to parse it. I see no evidence of your claim, and my position is not altered. If you...

This is nothing to do with this thread, and completely inappropriate for this site. What are you doing?

Again, I ask: show me one. Just one. I note that you didn’t. Probably because you can’t. As there is no such person. I don’t know you. Sorry. You’re not on my radar. I just counter arguments which seem to be disingenuous. If you feel that’s happening to you a lot, that probably says more about...

Show me one single person — just one — who expressed that Bledsaw is a crooked businessman and now holds him up as an avatar of honesty. Just one. Go on, I’m waiting. I’m trying to work out what this agenda you have is. It’s becoming a pattern now. Maybe just state it outright so we know...

Nobody ever says somebody’s been axed unless they did a MeToo type thing. Maybe he has left. Maybe he hasn’t. The BBC will never say “we axed him”.

I assume — and I can’t speak for them — the passion to make that product is strong and in this case it overrode other considerations. I get it—nostalgia for old stuff is a stewing thing for the middle-aged. My wife (then girlfriend) hooked me with a 1980s Optimus Prime toy as a birthday present...

What is this? Why is it on my website? Is that a quote from Judges Guild or Goodman Games? If it’s not… why is it on my website?

Then what’s this product? It’s not a future product? Until 2022 when they agreed that JG “needed to make some cash”. I’ll give you this: you’d make a great politician! The backward-bending fact-twisting you’ve been engaging in in this thread to make all this look perfectly normal despite the...

That’s just not why most people start businesses. They do it because they want to do a thing. That’s what they want to do with their lives. If all they wanted to do was make money, they’d do something else. Drug dealing or hedge fund management or something. Nobody starts a TTRPG company if...

Tabloid says nothing. Person posting link to tabloid also says nothing. This is the definition of a content-free post. C’mon, man. You can do better than that.

These confidentiality clauses allow Bledsaw to talk about (false?) times and dates but prevent Goodman from providing the (true?) facts? Either Bledsaw has one hell of a lawyer or Goodman has a terrible one. I suppose it’s possible that one side is adhering to the confidentiality clauses and...

Article updated with Joseph Goodman's response saying they are not doing Dungeoneer.

(Also, we're now having the same conversation in 3 different threads; I think I'll close this one. How about you post this in the most recent thread, so we can keep it all together. I'll update that article. Thanks!)