Search results

Umm... that's the thread the McArtor quotes came from.

If you mean Mike McArtor's statements: 1. I can't talk about Paizo products too far out in advance, but I too would really like to see DCII in 2007. Or ever. Email Wizards of the Coast and demand they let us do it. ;D and 2. It's because Paizo is a licensee of WIzards of the Coast. We pay for...

What would you expect to be in a Dragon Compendium? All the material is updated to 3.5 rules.

Do you have a source for the second part of this claim?

I think incresing the crit range of the arrows is a reasonable method, as are a number of suggestions offered here. In any case, I think the risk of death should be increased in such a situation, assuming the crossbows *could* hit them in the first place.

No but funny. The only played-by-another-player drastic outcome that I as a DM would permit, or I as a player would condone, is death. Death happens. It can happen regardless of specific player decisions. Converting to another class, picking up a very cursed item, etc... these things simply...

They already are.

I don't see a need for more or fewer rules. Rather, many of the rules can be streamlined, and many empty areas can have rules implemented.

I believe you have misunderstaood me. When I say a prestige class should be a base class played with style, I mean... A dwarven defender should not be a different class. It is a warrior that has chosen Feats and skills that make it adept at defensive fighting / bodyguard work. It is a niche...

Agreed and then some. A prestige class should be a base class played with style.

Much like KB9, I am more likely to notice poor artwork than good. However, neither greatly affects my impression of the content of the produce. The best art in the world does not save a crappy mechanics / crappy flavor product, and the worst art in the world will not ruin great content.

QFT and ditto.

I voted 16+ times. Then again, I started playing D&D in 1978.

If the NPC is someone/thing that the PCs are likely to combat, I need stat blocks. If the NPC is someone the PCs are likely to interact with more than once, I need background. Sometimes, the NPC requires both. Often, the NPC requires neither. I can't vote in this poll.

The news release says it is a free download. Where did they get that idea for this $3.99 adventure?

I voted "yes" but have a lot of different ideas of what "cool" means. It need not be earth shattering. The bonus feat and stat increase are already there at specific levels. I could see making one cross-class skills become a class skill at a certain level. Swap one point from one stat to...

Wow! 57:2 Never seen such a decisive poll!

I assume that I would want to be raised unless there is a good rason not to. If I was a follower of Wee Jas, I might refuse to return, respecting the nature of death in the order of things. If I died gloriously, I might refuse to return, choosing to enjoy the fruits of my labors in the...

I couldn't vote, since I can't find "no favored class" or "Any" on the list. A half-elf raised by humans is a human. A half-elf raised by elves is an elf.

I'm not buying it. This is because it has the word magic in it. I don't need more magic. Nothing against new books. I just prefer environment and world building books more.