Search results

I'd be interested to know as well since we will be making the switch to 3.5e psionics soon. ciaran

What alshaw says HAS to be correct because otherwise using DR 10/magic or silver makes the vampire worse off than he was before... because now ppl can use adamant weapons too. Seems too powerful though... maybe it works in parallel like folks have said? EDIT: silly me. working in parallel is...

Well, my problem isn't so much that certain classes HAVE certain skills as class skills... it's the opposite. I don't understand why the sorceror doesn't know things about planes quite as easily as a wizard. What's worse... a wizard is more inclined to pump up his INT, making the skill disparity...

How much of a bad idea do you think changing these around are? Ie: I made Use Rope a class skill for fighters? ciaran

I am looking at class-ness and cross-class-ness for the core classes in 3.5 PHB. Why do you think that they have things like: * Use Rope being CC for fighters, same for Knowledge (dungeoneering) * All knowledges being in class for wizards * All but one being CC for the sorceror These choices...

I wouldn't take XPs. I would have the next sensitive conversation for THEIR character right out in public. ciaran

Was charging the regen guy without material weaknesses for the cleric spell always on too expensive? ciaran

And there was a lawyer. What was his name? Kobayashi ... Kobayashi ... Kobayashi !!! ciaran

What the heck is paper tiger? Use U_K's CR system. LA = CR. ciaran

Good points, hardhead. Hong makes the real point, though. It's too much work! Ok, scrap the aging. ciaran

So where I've ended up is a combination of Impeesa's and Plane Sailing's ideas. Classes go through their standard progressions for levels 1-20 (in spite of being epic). Beyond 20th, the epic progressions for saves and BAB and all that good stuff is implemented. On top of this, I will have an...

I think of HP as "dodge". It eases the verisimilitude pain. ciaran

I would still be house-ruling my game to death if not for ENWorld. Thanks! ciaran

You probably mean for spells, right? I would also be curious about any official ruling on this. I haven't had any thri-kreen clerics, but............... ciaran

Anyone know why they eliminated aging attacks in 3e? I am considering restoring these abilities to ghosts. Anything I should be wary of before I do? ciaran

What if casters had an "epic spell DC bonus" every three levels or so? This takes the 20th level ratios and advances them as "poor" saves... This is assuming that we don't progress to ridiculous spell level heights. Anyone else think that the 0-9 levels should be scaled instead of introducing...

hoo. :D

Hey U_K... you know that you were missing mind flayer in v4? Just checking... ciaran

Where do you get this? About magic dealing non-lethal? ciaran

Thanks for your answers!