Search results

  1. E

    How "Table-Top" is Your Game?

    You know what works great. Take your MM and scan in the picture of the monster and crop it to get the picture. Using MS photo editor copy and paste it into an MSWord document then go back and using the Image drop down select rotate. In the resulting window click on the mirror radio button...
  2. E

    UPDATE: Uncanny Dodge vs. Feint

    My thoughts Ok guys I have read this all the way through and have some questions and thoughts. First is the SRD official? If so it uses the word “if” the word if in functions is meant as a qualifier. “ConditionA if conditionB or conditionC” means that conditionA is true when Conditions B or...
  3. E

    Getting around antimagic PC's.

    Why is it railroading? Is the DM supposed to play out this wisard stupidly? If a DM has a specific plan in mind for the sampaign there is nothing wrong with planning out the villians in such a manner to achieve those goals. Is the high level wisard smart? Does he have spies? Would he know...
  4. E

    Getting around antimagic PC's.

    You guys forgot the greatest power the all wisards have … the power to create new spells. How about a spell that rips open a hole to the Plane of fire or ice? The resulting discharge is pure elements and not magical in nature. Make it something like a cone of fire or ice and that will surely...
  5. E

    Sneak Attk, Multiple Atks, & Invisibility Question

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My 2 cents "Actions directed at unattended objects do not break the spell" What I was saying is that it appeared to state that it is a question of actions. Then by extension no he couldn't. The first action that he takes directly causes the spell to fail. There...
  6. E

    Sneak Attk, Multiple Atks, & Invisibility Question

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: My 2 cents I honestly take it all back the line of the spells says "an attack". That says single ...hmmm ... I still see how if you say that it is actions that the sage would say that FAA is one action that is when a player attacks. I'm leaning back now. Towards one...
  7. E

    Sneak Attk, Multiple Atks, & Invisibility Question

    Re: Re: Re: Re: My 2 cents The second that you and hypersmurf start answering the questions is the when I continue this conversation. The spell clearly talks about taking actions. A single blow is an action. Though it can come in many forms trip disarm ...etc. The spell talks about...
  8. E

    Sneak Attk, Multiple Atks, & Invisibility Question

    Wait this is a 3.5 question? I have to do some more looking at 3.5. Is the spell worded the same?
  9. E

    Sneak Attk, Multiple Atks, & Invisibility Question

    Re: Re: Re: Re: My 2 cents 1. That would be hard to pull off being a fighter v.s. a rogue 2. The examples of attack types weren't meant as a delimiting factor 3. Thus full attack allows a character to make multiple attacks as one action, the situation that you describe isn't following my...
  10. E

    Sneak Attk, Multiple Atks, & Invisibility Question

    Re: Re: My 2 cents In the SRD the spell says "attacks" not if a player takes an attack action. It goes on and says that taking an action to cast a spell that against a foe or area including a foe. The Full attack quote states that it is multiple blows. I was saying that the spell doesn't...
  11. E

    Sneak Attk, Multiple Atks, & Invisibility Question

    My 2 cents The way that I see it is that the word attacks isn’t defined as standard action attack. The spells suggests that it is any “action” that is used to attack others removes the invisibility at the end of that action. Thus even a full round spell can be used to attack a foe without the...
  12. E

    Sneak Attk, Multiple Atks, & Invisibility Question

    You could get all as sneak if you were attacking first as a surprise. Your character invis. sneaks to person and unloads I believe that they are all sneak as the opponent is flat footed right?
  13. E

    Dragon attacks?

    Does an age 2 gold dragon really get 6 attacks and at what bonus? 3.0 question
  14. E

    Worst DM Quotes at Gencon

    I think in general you are wrong about this but this isn't the the thread to discuss it in
  15. E

    Home-Grown Critical Effect Rules

    Re: Re: Re: For anyone who is still interested . . . yeah of course sorry about that.
  16. E

    Home-Grown Critical Effect Rules

    Re: For anyone who is still interested . . . Personally I liked the other idea better and I think that I'm going to use your location severity with the save versus hit bonus - level of opponent. I think that it might well need something but it gives the sense to players of being involved in...
  17. E

    SRD 3.5 Competition

    I guess that I will just agree to disagree. I think that your example is flawed as that isn't what we are talking about here. If that same friend offered to fix your breaks if your car was using standard parts that 90% of cars used but said that you were on your own otherwise that would ring...
  18. E

    SRD 3.5 Competition

    I have no problem with the first two statements. The third statement is way off the mark. It is making a couple of huge assumptions about who is going to see this, where the person is in their life and whether or not they are even looking for another job. The last time that I put out a...
  19. E

    SRD 3.5 Competition

    Okay first let me say that I’m totally jazzed that you willing programmers are working hard at bringing this SRD PDF to a better standard. Second let me say that some of the thoughts that is rolling around in here are distrubing at best. Having had experience in doing some free programming...
  20. E

    Options 3.5 ????

    From the sounds of this … the pdf isn’t really a true points system way to build characters. It offers different paths for characters starting with base class etc…
Top