Search results

They did that in 2nd Ed, what about the whole non-casting thing? Monk is my favourite class.

In DMing for 25 years I have only run a pre-canned adventure once, Ravenloft's Touch of Death, a one-off, BBQ style game.

-Cleric (druid, shaman, etc) -Fighter (paladin, ranger, warlord, etc) -Rogue (assassin, bard, etc) -Wizard (artificer, binder, sorcerer, warlock, etc) But what about my beloved Monk.

-Bard -Cleric -Druid -Fighter -Monk -Paladin -Ranger -Rogue -Sorcerer (still on the fence with this one) -Warlock (still on the fence with this one) -Wizard I would prefer Assassin, Barbarian and Warlord to be something else (same with Samurai). Oh, and would like psionics in core, either as...

Right on, the 4th Ed Manual of the Planes, The Plane Below and The Plane Above are some of the best books 4th Ed books, IMO; but, DDG?

The Sorcererous Powers could be a perfect way to deliver the psionic action, I remember earlier talk of a Psionic Background or Theme: "Awakened".

The Sorcererous Powers could be a perfect way to deliver the psionic action, I remember earlier talk of a Psionic Background or Theme: "Awakened".

The Sorcererous Powers could be a perfect way to deliver the psionic action, I remember earlier talk of a Psionic Background or Theme: "Awakened".

And when the fibres are connected on the outside (*said like H.I. in Raising Arizona*), you get fleas jumping football fields, as we all know.

Can we stop talking ill of the dead, especially so recently.

Subtle as a train-wreck, as usual.

What about a Psionic Heritage Sorcerer.

4th Ed encounters are much more predictable, not much swing (I am in no way advocating mass swing, I dig bounded accuracy), as for previous editions, i've had encounters I thought would last 7, go 2 rounds, or vice versa. That is all. P.S. Actually, one was done in the surprise round, what a...

I've been applying Strength checks/Skills incorrectly? I know, I know... But, this brings up an interesting point (well, to me...), as, as has been discussed, a demigod campaign transcends levels, Herakles/Hercules wasn't trained, he was just born with a giant bonus score because he's the...

Total, leave them all alone! Make a new one if you want to make a big dent/mark.

I like settings to remain static (let the individual DM evolve it), not to be meddled with too much from writers and their meta-setting ideas (such as Time of Troubles, Prism Pentad, The Grand Conjunction, Faction War, etc). Al-Qadim was perfect in this regard.

Yes, I removed the 1/2 level malarkey from characters and monsters like a cancerous growth (monsters provide a challenge over a greater span of levels, etc) makes such a difference.

What about the whole holding up a planet thing?

Well, not in my D&D multiverse (same with all the monster and demihuman deities), but was Vaprak mentioned in 3rd and/or 4th Ed?

I have experienced the opposite.