Search results

And if you dint have beyond? I bought the Eberron book so for me it's a SCAG type book.

Is that Canon Coruscant?

On beyond?

How about extra poison damage?

That's fine those players can go elsewhere. I wish them luck in their future endeavors

Well drowns if you rewrite the class or an archetype. Slayer ranger could hit. Avengers tripping over the Paladin.

I did write up the rules once. No lone wolf type characters were mentioned. These days it's verbal. Don't be a jetk don't roll play a jerk. That includes pvp, stealing off other players, cowards and lone wolves

Assuming one bought Eberon though.

Well it's not really tgat compatible when some fears are completely different for example. Or soelks got rewritten. Pain if you mix and match. Similar with classes. It's easier to cherry pick specific things vs using both. Are you actually playing 5.5?

Kind of already been done in 5.5.

So how much if the assassin would you ort into it? Familiar with BG3 Rangers?

5.0. Surprise round. Longbow retreat. Wash worse repeat. Rough terrain. England. Foods terrible moral collapses and they flee after getting peppered by arrows. Rangers vs slow fighter types. NPCs archers trained in stealth vs low dexterity slow English troops. They have bad food but very...

Unspoken rule my table is rights of the many outweigh the rights of the few. Players liked that get warned then booted. They're rare maybe 10% last ten years. I've got 1 plater he sucked at 5E he's doing reasonably well in 2E.

The claim was without issue. I dd say several clerics, sorcerer, bladesinger were fine but all the martials, artificer comparatively suck. 3.5 was kinda better for usable stiff but they revised the skills and damage reduction which was annoying. Various races are fine some spells and...

That was 5.0 gloomstalker lol. Or Gloomstalker assassin combo. I assume you're talking about a blend as an archetype?

Draconic Sorcerer is really good at all levels for most part. WM very good espicially later. Might be best one higher level.

No sometimes players have contradictory aims, goals, expectations. I give them a list of ideas im happy to run. Then they can suggest levels to start at. Generally they veto the most unpopular ones. Eg undead themed post CoS. Generally I'll pitch 5 ideas/themes. Hypothetically if...

If I lije the games it's great. If I don't it's the conservative gamers fault.

That's your subjective opinion. Objectively power creep in effect has obsolete most of the old clases and archetypes. It's not unplayable but weak. Every martial class without masteries cone to mind. Some missing spellcaster archetypes are fine if they were tuned high. Mostly clerics...

It's technically backwards compatible if you squint. Archetypes have most been power crept out and mixing in sone 5.0 stuff breaks the game more. It's like using 3.0 prestige classes in 3.5. You coukd do it not a good idea generally.