Search results

Yeah. Maybe. I've never liked dragonmarks generally or dragonmarked PCs specifically so I'd probably drop it as a PC option entirely.

I don't know that you'd really need much, if anything, to convert it. You already have a campaign frame inspired by Eberron (Five Banners Burning). The game encourages reskinning and reflavoring so most things could be covered there. Ancestries. The clank (warforged) and katari (shifter)...

"Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown."

I would push back on this a bit. The original 1977 Classic Traveller has a robust skill system and tells the referee to make up whatever skills or rolls they deem necessary to cover whatever else they might need or want. The note on the bottom of page 20 is fantastic. It was edited and changed...

Also, the SRD was updated and there’s a changelog. Added to the OP. https://www.daggerheart.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/DH-SRD-1.0-June-26-2025.pdf

If people are looking for a copy and don’t want to wait for Amazon or the eventual second printing, Barnes & Noble seems to have some fairly consistently. The 3-4 near me have copies and you can order from their website.

“…to dungeons deep and caverns old…”

Surprise. People who take the stance that you're supposed to try to win an unwinnable game will treat any nuance as a speed bump in their race to twist what you say around in order to win a discussion. Note how you can't win a discussion, only an argument. Thank you all for proving my point.

Yeah, it's fairly ubiquitous stance in conversations about this topic. It goes hand-in-hand with the other fallacy that because RPGs are a game you're meant to play to win. As if you can win an RPG. Which you can't. But yeah, it's part of the whole attitude around optimization and optimizers...

Yes, once. I walked away because I'm not interested in that style of play. This was me optimizing at +1 or maybe a +2 while the rest of the table was solidly around +4. It shows up when it becomes disruptive. That's when someone's an optimizer. If you're optimizing far more than the group...

Absolutely. The only spot on the spectrum that seems inherently problematic is the +5 Pun-Pun range. Unless that’s the point of a given game. Playtests and “break the game” sessions are a thing. But those are almost universally flagged as such. As you say, it’s mostly down to a mismatch of...

I think a step back from the word itself, quibbling over definitions, and looking at the behavior might help people actually talk to each other instead of talking past each other. There's a style of play or character creation called XYZ. Like most things, XYZ exists on a spectrum. You have...

There's a great thread over on RPG.net covering Classic Traveller. https://forum.rpg.net/index.php?threads/traveller-out-of-the-box-only-using-books-1-3.769219/ That same poster has a blog that covers Classic Traveller among other things...

I'm old, but not as old as some of the geezers around here. Getting old sucks. But, as far as I know, it's better than the alternative.

Besides everything else being great, that is my favorite part of Shadowdark. Darkness is dreadful, light vital, and resources matter. But in an easy to use way. Here’s a timer. Go. Attack the light. Hmm. Tasty tasty referee advice.

Re: horror as genre vs horror as tone. It's both. Some genres are defined by plots, others by characters, others by setting, and others by tone. Comedy and horror as genres are based almost exclusively on the tone they present. There are some distinct plot, character, and setting elements, but...

I’m fine with CR eating DW’s lunch. Too bad about 13th Age though. There are a few tactical elements in Daggerheart but, as you’re saying, nowhere near those other games. At a guess Draw Steel is going to dominate that area for awhile after it comes out. Yeah, it’s kinda wild.

Great article. For me games become too complex when there’s more than a few pages of rules. The shorter the better. A few paragraphs are great. A few sentences are better. At absolute minimum you need a resolution mechanic. But I would push against any argument that you necessarily need much...

I'm a big fan of horror games and I would gladly fill several threads chatting about them, but I want to keep this thread on track. So I've split this off into it's own thread. Please take the horror stuff over there. https://www.enworld.org/threads/what-makes-a-successful-horror-game.714028/

The question came up on another thread but I thought it was worth breaking off into it's own thread. By "successful" here I mean that it works as a horror game, not whether it makes money for the company. So, what do you think? What makes a successful horror game?