Search results

Agreed

Sure.. I was aware of the evidence that you didn't cite in any specific way, and still haven't. I'm also aware of previous times you've made this claim, and my previous disagreements with the conclusions you have drawn from it. Looking further into it now.. your assertion that the only caster...

I mean..you are the one who made the positive assertion (and provided zero evidence) and thus are the one with the burden of proof. But we'll let that slide, because we've already done this dance months ago the last time the Critical Role data was used to try and make this case. The example...

Enhh.. I'm not sure I'd agree that this is the story the Critical Role data tells, except in the most superficial of ways.

Bishops are a little weird, because you have one with no way to block or be blocked by the checkers at all and one that every checker could block, so it has a lot harder time getting through. If the relevant bishop can get to the back line, yeah its over. It is also kind of funny just...

I mean, you really only need to move every other pawn forward one space to set up a checker-impermeable defense. Then you move the queen to the checker-inaccessible diagonals, go straight to the checkers player's back ranks and clean up from back to front. The checkers player has literally no...

Makes as much sense as anything I guess, at least in a "the bars need to have a minimum height to fit the data label" kind of way. Still would be pretty weird to me, crafting a misleading but well-labeled graph.. but..🤷‍♂️. Is what it is I guess. Edit: To your point, there could be reasons for...

Lol. I assume whomever prepared the tea chart was similarly lacking. But at least that one has some pizzazz to it. And to be clear, it's not that I actually believe DDB is being nefarious. It's just kind of a head-scratcher since it takes extra work to make a scale weird.

That is a weird way to scale a graph, and takes a bit of work to accomplish since most data visualization applications are going to default to consistent axes and hash marks. Frequently, this kind of scaling would be indicative of shenanigans on the part of whomever prepared the graph (because...

Is this a real show? Or like a meme template people splice hockey fights into for youtube?

This is some top-tier nitpicking.

It's troublesome to analogize interstellar navigation to terrestrial navigation. Terrestrial landmarks' relative postions are static with respect to one another. This is not the case with planets. Consider the initial premise here, that as a function of "standard system entry protocol", a...

Honestly, always passing Jupiter sounds more like something to nitpick rather than an indicator of a likely standard practice. Seems like the kind of thing you'd expect from someone who saw a diagram of the Solar System but can't imagine the planets in that diagram moving.

Feel like I remember this being a regular part of the TNT morning lineup along with Wings, Boston Common and Working.

2-dimensional thinking?

Oh my God. I am so sorry for your loss.

Yeah. Pretty much every time the characters went over to Angela's office, it was time to take a break from immersion. "Oh you're also a forensic acoustician too now?? Go ahead..enhance away."

It's hard to say, but they must be shaving their entire face from forehead to chin...every day.

The Mickey Mouse Clubhouse. What is Mickey's position in the world that all this stuff is named after him? The clubhouse itself, but also local landmarks like Mickey Park? For a birthday episode they have to get a bunch of ingredients for a cake. They put stuff together and put it in the oven...