Search results

If they leave the DDI support it will be good. Its just too awkward to do it without it. I really like 4th.

It's liquid electricity? It's uber salty* or magically hyper conductive water which predisposes the victims to be electrocuted? A wizard did it? (*not too salty or the electricity is conducted through the water and doesn't enter the body)

It seems to be a step forward and two steps back so I don't think so. Then again it might be the best thing ever. However I like the fluidity of 4E so if we go back to the clunky 3.x/PF style rules I won't be too bothered.

It sounds intriguing but I wonder if by trying to accommodate everyone they will fail utterly or create a medocre product. I like the current edition best of all. It is not that complex, (and can be further simplified with essentials) allows for a lot of fluff. The skill challenges need...

For me in 4E the streamlined combat as well as 're-fluff encouraged' style of play actually allows greater freedom. The rules are clear and not as clunky as 3rd Ed (feats aside!) so allow for more freedom I find. A bit like 2nd E - the rules were that mad and abstract that it was a 'get you...

Sounds like the pirates : global warming issue! Some games you just want to run in kill baddies have fun. Other games the PCs want to have to think ... if we kill/murder/assassinate this enemy (say an evil noble) we're going to be treated as criminals... but if we wait to prove his guilt then...