Search results

Don't bother. It was a great miniseries with two or so amazing seasons, followed by a two-season nosedive into a finale so bad I wish I'd never watched a single episode.

All <vegans> do <not eat animal products>. Do you see where you went wrong?

I also live in Sacramento. What store(s) do you buy for?

That's all well and good for Spike, but Timmy and Johnny don't care.

Ductus if you wanted the past participle. The infinitive is ducere. Eques is the singular. The adjective equester is also sometimes used substantively.

Blizzard first used these in Warcraft 3 (on the Warden and Blademaster, respectively). In fact the pre-WoW Warcraft games are full of D&D stuff, from Ogre Magi to Dust of Appearance.

He didn't. The link no longer works because it's a new day and, thus, a new woot. You can still find yesterday's woot here. There's no disguised criticism of anybody's play style or anything like that, folks, just a randomly hilarious product review.

Seriously?

Because then we'd never hear the end of Carmen Electrum dragons.

In addition to the ones already listed, ArenaNet. Guild Wars is basically 4e meets Magic, too, and Jeff Grubb happens to be a lead designer there.

You've been a member long enough to know better.

The arbitrariness of the sign is a basic feature of semantics at this level. If everyone starts using "cat" to mean "dog" then "cat" does, in fact, mean "dog." There is nothing to be right or wrong about: words mean what people use and understand them to mean. See the word history of internecine...

And also simply wrong. The OED has this use of piracy attested in legal contexts 400 years ago, and that's just the OED. More importantly, it continues to appear in legal contexts today, such as in the majority opinion of Dowling v. United States, which Krensky brought up earlier. People have...

Yes, they violated some basic marketing practices. Violating basic marketing practices can be a very effective marketing practice. See: Dana White.

The way you just said it, I think. It isn't necessarily relevant how games are intended to be played, no more so than how houses are intended to be lived in. When it's your house you can do whatever you want with it. Who cares what the architect had in mind?

Kael'thas.

You don't need to read The Faerie Queene.

Dollhouse has a more overtly philosophical premise. It does not have more philosophical content.

Maybe. But it's also possible that both the game and the rebuttal were for the lulz and you're the victim of some epic trolling.

Impressive. I just don't buy the old line that, as Mustrum_Ridcully put it, "everyone has something to say that has merits." In fact, I think a lot of people have absolutely nothing interesting or worthwhile to say. The ignore list is just a handy tool for muting these people so they don't...