Search results

ask him. if he already has somthing that needs you to stay with your current god them it'll be better if you do. swiching deities may not effect your character much but it might affect your dm's plans.

although thats a great idea and i really like terry prachets books i don't see myself ever running a compaign in discworld. but if i did it will probobly be a d20 system, dnd 3.5 most likely, as i never actually used any other system and probobly never will.

i didn't want to print it because it was a hell of alot of paper to waste. he actually did print it, but it was still annoying because unlike the spells from the ph, which we both remember almost every detail about, the spells in the compendium were new and it still took time to check every...

i see nothing wrong with this style of play, in my previous game the players just wanted to fight everything they came upon even if it was obvious that they will lose, i would greatly like to have a party that tries to stir away from fights unless they have no choise, after all people try to...

nothing wrong with elves, except the way they look in the ph, i preffer the lotr looking elves, no chinies eyes, no too long ears and are human hight. same thing with halflings, they look like crap in the ph and i preffer the lotr looking halflings.

i don't like wotc one bit, their prices are high and they sell all kinds of crap (imo) apart from dnd, but it is true that 3rd party dnd stuff is just trash when you look at how unbalanced it all is (or at least most of it), apart from the core rule books, wether 3.0 or 3.5, you don't need...

in 3.5e there are no prehibited skills, you can take anything as a cross-class

i have a home-made 3.0 spell compendium i downloaded a long time ago from somewhere i don't remember. it is simply a huge collection of spells from many diffrent sources. it was quite annoying for me while i was a dm for a guy that really like to have alot of spells, so every time he wants to...

yeah, i really like them too, i like most of the near-humanoid creepy-creatures (like mind flayers). if they're suprised then they'll be easy pickin' for a low-mid to mid level party but if they're ready with their defensive spells (stoneskin, imp invisibility, ect) they can toast the party...

gnome. do you pronounce it g-nom or now-m?

the spell weaver is an extremly powerful creature for its cr 9, it can kill one character per round with 30d4+30 points of magic missile dmg. it's considerd a 12th level sorcerer for spellcasting plus it has its spell weaving ability, thats way over 9 cr. a 12th level human sorcerer would be...

although i have not the slightest knowledge about eberron classes (so i don't know if this class you're talking about is really overpowerd) i think that every class can be made into something more powerful if the player knows how to biuld the character. i had a player in my group that always had...

my first group was astablished by a friend of mine about 4 or 5 years ago and had 5 players and him as dm. we, that i, him and another guy, stayed togather and tried to find people to replace those that left us. now the other guy left so its only the astablisher, me and random losers who uselly...

nowadays neither i nor my players cheat (well, maybe sometimes, but only forgivably) but a few years ago when i just started playing dnd i did cheat, both as player and dm. as a player i would cast as a sorcerer even though i'm a wizard (or the like) as dm i would fudge die rolls to keep either...

ooh! i get this all the f***ing time! i really hate some of my players (well, not really. if i hate them i don't play with them), and even more so when they don't call! if its the first or second time i call them and they say something on the lines of 'sorry. will come next time' if they don't...

another thing just poped to mind, i'd like to have a comuter battle system, like in the computer game temple of elemental evil for instance, where the dm controls the enemys and the players control their characters, this could really speed up combat.

you idiot! you forgot planescape! well, i don't like most of the other settings and grayhawk has set the norm for what 'normal' is, so i'd go with grayhawk even though i didn't know the normal setting had a name until quite resently.

dnd 3.0\3.5 never played anything else (maybe in computer games but that doesn't count) might be interested in other d20 games such as d20 modern\future or the star wars rpg but nothing with a greatly diffrent rules system

hmmm... i don't have much to say except that i like this thread and would like to see the outcome of that wizards quest for revenge

the 3.0/3.5/d20 rules are alot better then any other rules system i've ever used. the only thing i ever liked in previous editions was the planescape setting fron 2nd edition, and that has nothing to do with the rules system, i merely liked the setting.