Search results

the question is how unrecognisable would Earth's media landscape even be?

I miss the idea of dwarven sub-options but what we had was a weak idea, we need something stronger with a clearer identity. also, the names suck. something like stone dwarves, fire dwarves, sand dwarves, metal dwarves and ice dwarves would sound far cooler and more evocative.

orcs are the tribal guys, dragon born in 4e wanted their old empire back. goliath are insufficiently built for a clear role to appear beyond the strong guys

that and changing tastes. it is more I do not see much of fantasy fiction that is fantastic beyond damn magic or monsters they could try other things depends on the japanise fantasy they got elves for days

yeah there is a reason most fantasy just has humans in it now in books

the problem is all subsequent fantasy realised you can just use humans for that and things have been bad for them ever since

the whole point is they were meant to be stand-ins for the average person, it was never about them being cool but more that everyone could in principle do it. and yet how many others were lost never to be seen again? depends on how you build dragonborn structaly as that determines weather...

they fail to have much in the way of cool factor or the ability to do plot-relevant things. and yet things die off as ideas, stories fade to lost text and such, we have barely changed but what we do has. secondly why not seek to make something more timeless in addition why not more? the ents...

nothing in this or any other world can be timeless. dude I could shoot every halfling in Fr or greyhawk and the game bearly changes only two are core demi-humans

how are the lizardmen more useful as a core option they basically are happy with nothing ever happening they do not build anything or pursue ambitions they feel like a facultative sophont in comparison to everything else obligate?

should we make these video/videos?

the hobbits should not be on the trunk as they are just too limited for most stories by design and the dwarves should grow a second distinct option. the new guys need an example of setting integration.

elaborate as I want to know how they work or are. it is not about denting a monolith more growing new branches on a great tree

how do we make them less lizardy and more dragony? because no one seems to seek to make something new more explore every damn variation of tolkians options beyond adding animal people for some reason. secondly you did not tell me what I asked which was what where these options?

then please give the definitions as all words where once meaningless

to assume the Tolkien options are perfect seems off, regardless you describe a rule for objects defined only as products eg films, books, tv not a game line or broad ideas for some topics of fiction. stone melts and erodes because it does not grow they could be more ideally in the hands of...

TikTok is too short form, but youtube has sufficient video size to do it properly.

we need a video explaining this to the modern reader I know who moorcock is as the chaos guy and where Warhammer stole from but nothing else. a grand explanation of fantasy cannon would be useful devided in eras

not much they are supposed to be from the same area of the Tree of Life one just stole the snake's legs. humanoid is a shape, not a lineage.

I dislike that he is a great sky-dominating lone mountain in fantasy I would prefer chains myself