Search results

there is a medium between hyper-specific and so broad as to nearly be anything. it should be no more specific than paladin and ranger and should be a able to have other small concepts contained in it.

gith gishs are arcane the psionic gish is even less represented. sub classes seems viable as how you build them could be interesting. 4es was mobility and damage types could be used with a gith gish fairly easily a death knight embodies the words unwilling to die and would be a decent tank...

damn radioactive wild fire now there is a evil wizard option. sulfur is brimstone as is to hell adjacent for marketing.

but earth is rock, soil and sand it does not feel acid which is the grinding down of solid by liquid/ water is cold but so is the wind, cold is this deep absence to the world not a thing you touch, water Being acid goes well with its mutability and it grinds down the world, like all chaos does...

wait so what do you think they should make then as apart from rereleasing all of 5e for 5.5e I do not see much they can do that will get people excited. I do find that it is more not designed to support what people who want coop storytelling, would need a far less punishing stat system, more...

those are not foes in fiction. secondly, you do not want evil wizards with the give cancer spell or colourless fireball?

ah so in much the clerics and druids already live in dnd. these are two classes specialised in doing different parts of the job in this case being one with nature

elves since basic mixed magic and sword play it is a thing they do. so I can see the logic of associating it with elves but a more the elves have lots of them and will train more of them seems far more logical that making it all about elves.

I think it is more integration into the setting and DMs having veto on that sort of thing or hell simply not finding an option you like. my extrapolation is the arcane half-casters in other fiction seem to get imbued with magic and it is thus a set of a question of, how, why and what the...

cold is total absence, earth is just crushing mass it is the most mundane as it is the solid one if it has to have a damage type at or atomic would be the most workable as radioactive stuff tends to be solid.

how is earth acid surely water being one of the most powerful solvents known should be the plane with acid damage? wood is the element of growth in classical Chinese thought, they merged water and air and somehow ended up with metal being also perfectly electromagnetism probably by blind luck...

how are spirits and elementals not part of nature?

I might be the one none dm here

damn that is longer than I have been alive

you guys have reliable groups

but no experimentation breeds apathy to new content as you effectively already have it thus no sales either or am I missing something? stryxhaven was a wizard school in a game with other options thus only some will buy it also mtg settings really do not fit in dnd by design structure. to do...

how does the green hell of nature grant spells or are they just hippy wizards or something? also how are shamans different from what makes them not a druid beyond mechanics or are they related like how paladins and clerics are?

the dnd druid has the problem of trying to stuff to much into a chassis built on turning into animals. that and no setting save what ever happened in 4e explains makes the difference between nature cleric and druid clear

do you mean anti-paladin as in an evil reflection as that would just be a sub-class now? or anti in the how it is made, forged by mortals rather than gods?

okay all although I know what a death knight is define one as it is not really clear what they are past have necromancy spell and heavy armour? beyond aesthetics and different spell lists what makes them different from a paladin and what is the role play meat here?