Search results

I don't know I think if you want to argue hit points you need more then that though... I know that my fighter ALREADY is pushing past the pain of damage and no amount of cheerleading effects him any more then the cheerleaders next to a football team do...

I am argueing we should not ADD to the game NOW something that people object to... if you want to start an anti cleric thread go see how many people post...

it is a magic spell given by a deitie... if you don't understand that then you must be very new to D&D... Divne SPELLS are MAGIC... are you argueing for the warlord to use SPELLS and MAGIC?

I put myself in for the $90 but I'm not sure about spending so much...

not at all you just made it look rediculase, and I think it is very rude of you... faih didn't heal anything the MAGIC did... if your shouting was MAGIC it would not break the game like it did

it's because they can vote both...

lets take this one step father with Players A,b,c,D,and 1... 1 is already the odd man out... So player A is going to DM at his local store every Friday night for three months. He has his own world that is pretty generic fantasy... his first adventures are re writes of old mods and ideas... if...

and yet, someone can come sit at my table at my FLGS and not only eat a pineapple or mushroom pizza, but force me to at the same tables....

yes, and I don't want those options... and if I'm not the DM... that is a great list of stuff I never want to see again... the compromise is a non official warlord... go get sasquatch or kobold or green ronnin to make one, if you like it use it, just PLEASE don't make WoTC do it...

isn't the avenging paliden supposed to be the 5e avenger?

but if enough people don't want mushrooms, they are fully in there right to ask the pizza shop owner and baker "Hey can you make a special with no mushrooms" or in this case "Hey can you make an edition with no warlords"

gee, how inclusive of you... There are lots of compramises... I didn't want HD or second wind, both made it into the game I didn't want nerfed buff spells that wouldn't stack or the concentration mechanic in general, it made it in I didn't want damage on a miss, and hey that one we got...

you all make the same mistake, you assume that I have one and only one group that 100% agrees with me... and I bet that is a rare thing in RPGs today. The problem is that when 5 or 6 of us sit down we all agree to play D&D... now if they publish a warlord I can't force others not to play it...

I am going to try to actually contribute here... I am being serious (as much as I hate 4e in general) let me try to explain... I don't want to play make believe in a world that allows things I think are stupid... I bet you don't either. SO when one of us says "That's stupid" we need to stomp it...

in 3.5 my group used to joke that the weapon didn't matter cause every rouge threw x number of shortswords with it, where x was 1/2 level...

I can't believe this thread is still going... I skipped like 3/4 of the middle but I have to ask the point of all this warlord BS, I mean didn't mearls basically say never again?

Alchemist (various) 21 Artificer (2E Spells and Magic)/Eberron 21 Curry Lord (makes lemon curry) 7 Gunslinger (Pathfinder) 23 Jedi (SWSE) 15 Mystic (2E) 20 Psion(2E-4E) 18 Thief-Acrobat (1E) 27 Warden (4E) 11 lets kill the other fake class next... down to 4e In a poll of D&D classes that...

long time lurker first time poster, I signed up just to say that I dislike the split... I wish it was one spell again

Acolyte 14 Charlatan 16 Criminal 20 Entertainer 20 Folk Hero 22 Gladiator 21 Guild Artisan 22 Guild Merchant 20 Hermit 11 Knight 17 Noble 22 Outlander 18 Pirate 18 Sage 17 Sailor 17 Soldier 21 Spy 20 Urchin 16