Search results

This is only sort of the right topic ... but its always seemed to me that so long as those you raise come willingly, then its at least non-black necromancy. Like say ... an necromancer wizard who runs a city state. His people may never need worry about enlistment into military service, or even...

I think the Mystic Theurge has no flavor. Therefore, for most games, it should be made to have flavor. So more power to ya. Sounds like you've got a good starting point ... but why specifically a magic deity? That'll pretty well limit them to one deity per world.

It looks like you changed the spell known. But i don't remember that from the origional. Did you indeed change the spell/day, or did i misread? Imho, keeping the current spells/known should be ok -- less work to change, and you don't get much out of changing it.

or just go cleric with magic and trickery domains. Sure, simple weapons. So? If necessary, pick up a martial weapon prof.

i say half-orcs make the best fighters. Fighters are all about strength, about crushing your enemies and seeing them driven before you. Dwarves on the other hand ... are the bestest barbarians ever. Barbarians can take a lickin, and the +2 con just reinforces that. but, just imho.

Hmm... posted and it didn't post. weird. Anyway, I'm yoinking the first post. Thought I'd letcha know.

I'd love to bring up a character from our home game and see how he does in a different group. Do keep me informed about this thing.

i could be down. But why all the way up at Game HQ? I betcha you could do it at Wizard's, and that Brian would be happy with it.

97. Its the highest prime on the desired set of numbers.

I say nat 20.

I didn't really scale it against the higher level ones -- but an average was come for. Unless, of course, the random monster roll suggested something really stupid high -- like the CR +5, which is where the tpk's came from. Afterwards, I had them make up 20th level characters. A sorcerer...

3 TPK's in an hour and a half. Alright, this probably belongs in the Story Hour forum, but its not really a story. I set up a DnD game today, primarily because it is super bowl sunday. I had all the PCs be from the same place, just to make it easier. Here was character creation: d6 for race...

one thing i noticed off the top of my sleep deprived brain is: no spellcasting progression. I know, low magic world. But you want it to appeal to your sorcerer and your cleric. And without any spell-casting, i do not believe it will. My cleric woudn't take it, neither would my insane sorcerer...

I always figured the stats were grouped thusly: int/con -- the internal hardiness. wis/dex -- defense, that sort of thing str/cha -- influencing the world, whether by arms or by force of personality. I might run a game that is actually DnD but not tell anyone -- just have the stats grouped like...

::withdraws from the race:: I've ranted about Kant, and that's enough.

Strength is how much you can extend your might into the world. Constitution is how hard it is for you to be hurt. Both are definetly physical stats. Strength is offensive, dexterity is defensive, and constitution is internal. More or less. But point is, those three are definetly physical stats...

"2) Paladins can't lie: This is an offshoot of the Knight's code..." Here's why this sticks around and probably should: Immanal Kant. While in the real world, ethics are going to vary from person to person and the entire field of ethics is somewhat chaotic (don't forget nobody really knowing...

how about wood in steak?

and hey, don't forget about fireball. You've got some damaging spells, fireball will make that all the stronger.

::takes:: Perfect for the Imperius Magi.