Search results

Found the answer....

Either way if you didn't beat his stealth check with your perception check you can't see the Warlock and he gets CA against you as per the Stealth Skill?

The Warlock's Shadow Walk Ability says: "On your turn, if you move at least 3 squares away from where you started your turn, you gain concealment until the end of your next turn." Now under Stealth it says: Cover or Concealment: Unless a creature is distracted,you must have cover against or...

Sweet, that's how I ruled it. Thanks Mouseferatu

Tonight in our session we fought a Larva Mage. It has "takes half damage from melee and ranged attacks; Vulnerable 10 radiant," We had a melee attack which did +1d6 radiant damage thanks to Weapon of the Gods. Should I have added the 10 vulnerable before I halved the damage or after I...

Cleric 10 utility power. Here's the line from the book: Effect: You conjure four ghostly warriors, each occupying 1 square within range. As a move action, you can move any of the knights 2 squares. My question, can you move all of the knights or any one knight as a move action?

I couldn't choose what best fits me. I dislike 4th Ed. own the books, and have played 4th Ed. It seems like your presuming if you've played 4th ed you will like it.

There seems to be quite a few cleric Area of Effect powers that list targets as 'Enemies in burst' Flame Strike is an example and I think Fire Storm or something like that.. Do all of these really only hit your enemies? If so Clerics will be awesome nukers.

I like the system, I think we share many of the same thoughts on multiclassing. I think I'm going to make the power swapping feats seperate though. And i think I'm going to drop the only one other class limit.

I tried to base it as closely as I could to Bull Rush, one of the few non power options left. If you wanted to simplify it further you could even drop the +1 from two handed weapons. The problem, once you realize the npc/monsters to hit numbers are ad hoc you could go beserk trying to recalc...

Yeah, I think Overrun is a little wonky and doesnt' need to be there. Disarm is pretty sword fight iconic for me though. After thinking about it more, I think it has a bit to do with the way monster npc are created. If the numbers are just thrown down as you need them. When the baddie loses...

Has anyone heard any designers say why these were removed? I din't think any of them were overly powerful or abusive. I think they'd be even less so now in 4E when you can attack with your fist just as easy as any weapon.

I don't know, which ever category Temple of Elemental Evil would have been under. That game was by far the best D&D game I ever played!!

Now that I think of it. They will probably just wait and put any revisions/errata into the special edition in Nov or Dec (I think) this year.

There was a revision in 3.0... I'm positive there were two printing runs. If you checked the dates on the info pages there was a second print at a later date which was supposed to include errata up to that point. I can't remember the dates though. As for 3.5, I think it was just he leather...

Yesterday I was totally psyched driving home from work, I was talking to my wife on the phone and she told me a book had come in the mail. So she opened it while I was on the phone... just the DMG... I don't know why they only shipped the dmg, the other two still say the 6th... I was so fricken...

It actually shouldn't apply to this. Because it says in the rules section of the adventure booklet that you can not take an immediate action on your turn. So if the fighter is approaching the kobold it's his turn and therefore he can't make his immediate attack.

I ruled that he didn't incur the -2 because the attack did include the marking creature. But don't know if that's right.

Well there you go...