Search results

I've been seriously considering a Gnome Barbarian for the following reasons: Barbarian Saving Throw Proficiencies: Strength, Constitution While Raging: Advantage on Strength Saving Throws Level 2 Danger Sense: Advantage on Dexterity Saving Throws Gnomish Cunning. You have Advantage on...

I'd run it as a skill challenge: Skill Challenge: The Great Catch Goal: The players must successfully catch a set number of fish (or a particularly legendary fish) before time runs out or resources deplete. DC: Use the standard formula of 9 + party proficiency bonus (adjust as needed for...

Nope. Not interested.

I just hope they go live action. I won't watch animated stuff these days with very rare exception. Particularly not mature adult animated.

They do it because they were under contract. It's been a total train wreck for them. 67% drop from season 1, which itself was no great success.

It has not. It does not rank in their top anything. Season 3 had a 36% drop from season 2. A 67% drop from season 1 to 3. That show has been a train wreck.

The Witcher is considered a marginal show, not in the top 25 of anything, and constantly criticized. It's viewership is low, and its budget kept getting cut because of that. It's certainly not something people should cite as a successful way to market a show. I have never even heard of the AMC...

I don't think it would sell better or worse. I just think a certain type of nerd likes to talk about those aspects.

That is the weirdest list. Sopranos is old and was not made for streaming (ended before streaming was really a thing). Sex in the City is old, not made for streaming (also ended before streaming was really a thing), and is PG-13. The Witcher...was a failure. Interview with the Vampire is old and...

Ah come on it's not borderline NC-17 and you can turn that stuff off. It's really not a meaningful part of any story. I find it kind of silly actually. It's just something linked to long rests. And I do not think it is linked to why BG3 is selling really well. It's just a good game.

Kent, you came into an old thread which was revived just because someone wanted an update. Coming in to moralize (and make personal insults) about a personal use D&D aid which isn't for sale and isn't about art, repeatedly, is kind of rude. I get it, you don't like it, so find a thread you do like.

I'll ask him next game. They've gotten better since then. Don't know if the prompts are available or not.

Once I saw the big picture of how it works with the mounted combat rules, lance, feats. and the dragon rider concept, I loved the class. Needs some tweaking but it's really very good. Uniquely good on the fighter platform, due to feats.

Jump will be more consistently fun. As long as someone has a familiar for scouting in the party, go with jump. If nobody has a familiar, maybe reconsider for scouting purposes.

Both of you are going to be in trouble with the pedantry police!

Interesting. Inflict ups their damage average from 5 to 11. I'd say doubling their DPR should be a CR adjustment.

Welcome to the boards!

None of those traits were in the 2014 rules. They're all new. I think at this point the conversation isn't productive. You claimed Crawford spoke to CR, he didn't so you claimed him not talking about it is evidence it doesn't matter. You claimed 2014 is the rule when it obviously isn't. You...

Right. WITHOUT mentioning the impact on CR. Which is what I have been talking about and you responded to. CRAWFORD DOES NOT METION WHAT IMPACT SPECIES TRAITS ADDED TO NPCS HAS ON THE NPCS CR. We agree on that now? He doesn't in any way say or imply no impact on CR. The DMG says it may well...

He didn't. He really didn't say that. He said you can just call it whatever species you want but he does not say go ahead and add any traits and it has no impact on CR. He never once mentions the impact on CR in the video. Just flat out he does not say that. Do I need to go to the video and...