Search results

ever since i played planescape torment i started using sigil speak, although i don't do it often nowadays

i always use references to a d20 especialy when i go shooting with a few friends 'thats a 20 alright' means an arrow in the bullseye 'ha! a 1 you loser' means totaly missed the target

[ :p ] so... you just figured out how big a city we will need to hold 7.5 million chicken considering space, gp limit and population. now, if we have an avrege city of 20,000 (what size should it be?), considering that every chicken is 2cp, every lb of feed is 1cp, every chicken lives 6 months...

aah... i like this theard :lol:

really nice, but it does seem very powerful considering it's only a feat, it also does not requir the character to destroy magic items every time him needs his dr. the see no magic ability is really nice, with a maching name to boot, still i think that this is the most overpowerd part of the...

after reading one of these threads i though: can a forsaker take the vow of proverty? that would be a really tough combination that doesn't use any magic items. :]

first off, i'm pretty sure the effect has been more in the other direction, rpgs effecting computer games, and mostly for the better. the most obvious positive affect was getting me into gaming. i only started playing dnd after i played planscape torment. some games may give good insperation to...

hmm... seems like i'm having trouble with the table. if any mod happens about, can you please edit the quote in a way that the table will be readable? i don't seem to know how to do that... :\

greeting all, i was looking for a 3.5 version of the forsaker described in the masters of the wild, but found that it does not exist. i come here in hopes that you will help me make a reversion of the class, balanced and as close to the original concept as possible. following is the original 3.0...

in that case i'm going to the house rules forum, if anyone has any suggestions for a 3.5 version of the forsaker please share your thought.

i was wondering where i might find a 3.5e version of the forsaker prestige class discribed in the masters of the wild, can anyone help? thanks in advance.

it looks like a good idea. although niether i nor anyone i play with ever take the 'extra' feats.

generaly, man and woman are equels in my game world, altough some societies might not belong to the 'general' people. for me it seems that the unequelaty is out of game, i rarely had a female player at my gaming table, although that might be because of my lack of social skills :p

i've never actually played 2e dnd but from what i read here it sounds that getting to higher levels was a long and hard task. this looks in a way much more realistic then 3e where you get up in levels reletively fast (to months in game and you're already 10th level). after all advancing from...

you mean like a level cap in a computer game? i don't know, maybe 12, very powerful but not too powerful at the same time, and you still have a long 12 levels to advance before that.

whenever the party enters an empty room the dm say 'oulooloo oulooloo' (kind of a bird like voice) and all the others will say 'the sound of nothingness'. we have at least one break during the game in which we go outside and fight each other with broomsticks (kind of larping) it really hurts...

i really wanted to make part of the game horror themed and creepy, thats why i intruduced this specific dongeun in the first place, it turnes out that i'm either really bad at delivering the creepyness or it's just not to thier liking, anyway they make jokes about mostly anything so making a...

hmmm. having all the goblins die is a good plot twister, i think i will use it, now i need to decide how they all got killed incase the players look into it.

no, i don't think so. but when it comes to ranged attacks its arrow per attack, which does not at all seem possible (15 arrows a round?! who the heck can fire 15 arrows a round?!)

i'll dm and play any level betwin 1 and 20 but i do agree that it gets a bit more complex above 10th level