Search results

Tasha's is playtesting for a "D&D 5e Revised."

I'm a fan of racial ability score adjustments, but I believe race should be a driving force behind your character's abilities. I firmly believe an elf should feel completely different from a dwarf, but I'd be happy to ditch ability score adjustments to make this happen. Ultimately, +2 here or...

Easiest method is to (a) play a different system, and/or (b) create modules that support this "something else" playstyle. Using the second option to introduce setting-specific elements and variant rules that serve the genre you desire to cultivate can provide a play experience more aligned with...

Hmm, can't say I'm a fan of the changes. The "ackshually, drow were good all along, and they were corrupted into evil drow by that nasty Lolth" is really, uh, not hitting for me. I'm a fan of dark eldar in Warhammer 40k, though, and I like matriarchal spider-worshipers who worship an evil...

That +2 doesn't actually matter that much. +2 Dexterity is very useful, and picking a race just for that most optimal bonuses is incredibly lame.

I'd love a 5e that more closely resembled Basic Moldvay. Race-as-class is dope.

I agree with this section, but I take issue with this part: The mechanical workings of earlier editions force the game to be more lethal than newer editions. Certainly, a GM might softball encounters in old school D&D, but there's only so much he can do against a game built around encountering...

There are certain arguments in OSR/grognard circles that are bizarre and disconnected from reality, one of those being "the games weren't more lethal" (in the same way that some people will insist that 4e combat was deadlier than 3e combat). It's simply not true. A character in old school D&D...

Grognardism is good for the same reason that historical preservation societies are good. 3d6 down the line, if you please.

With regard to combat in D&D and murderhoboism: Combat is rules-intensive with the most defined input/output and a definite win/lose state. Input: To-hit roll vs. AC. Output: Deplete opponent's hit points. Win/Lose: Determined by whomever reaches 0 HP first. Everything else is dependent on...

Certainly have. Star Wars: Saga Edition is still Star Wars D&D despite the systemic changes. It moved away from D&D, but the basic gameplay was the same. To translate: he's saying the GM controls the RPG world, the players interact with it, and the GM adjudicates these interactions based on...

I will agree with this. My go-to game is Savage Worlds. It's a flexible, genre-neutral system that encourages pulp action adventure. It can do fantasy, science fiction, gothic horror, and spaghetti westerns. It does them all very well...but it only does them in shades of Savage Worlds. Every...

What's our boy Dancey up to these days, anyway?

It's a little difficult to have these high-level design discussions with people who only play traditional RPGs, especially those whose primary game is D&D.

Yes, but not without a lot of work from the GM's side. Mythic stories generally don't involve resting to recover hit points, Strength checks to scale walls, or close calls with a random encounter. Assuming the PCs are so competent as to succeed most of the time and describing the PCs' actions...

Exactly. The system--along with Inspiration--are clearly tacked-on and underdeveloped in an attempt to create more narrative- or story-oriented gameplay. They should either be excised or expanded. As they stand, they crowd the character sheet.

Page-flipping over exact rules is a gameplay nightmare. Every instance in which the participants half the game to consult the rulebook leeches tension and engagement. It is valuable to have an understanding of the rules, and a proper adjudication of the game requires the GM to recall them well...

Modern trends in game design have realized that what you reward with XP is what you get more of. If you reward XP for treasure gained, you'll get players who strip every monster for loot and filch the paintings off the walls. If you give them XP for killing monsters, they murder everything...

I'm going to echo the critiques espoused thus far: your text is lengthy and rife with jargon. It is exceedingly unfriendly to anyone trying to learn the system. Compare it to a very simplistic description of mechanics: I'd be even inclined to Strunk and White this down further. Contrast that...

If this is all reprints of the older edition, is there anything I should be interested in if I like 7e and have all the materials from that Kickstarter?