Search results

hope all is going well! :)

yes, and LOL :) I always loved the Lava Children picture too. ;) unless you say otherwise, i'll consider that a nomination for the Killmoulis. ;)

ahh... well in that case, i won't call Conflict of Interest on him - this time. ;) as for the stunjelly aka living wall, i did actually picture the FF's stunjelly in my head and wondered if that might not be another name for it. the name does call to mind a Ravenloft creature though, which is...

by the way, i'd also like to take this opportunity to point out what i've been up to on Wikipedia. :)

hey, welcome to my thread... i've got to be more careful about accidentally summoning people by using their names, in case they're too busy. ;) Cool on getting the norker involved, that one has been out of sight for some time. and i absolutely support you on getting the Qullan's name and flavor...

hmm, not sure where the livng wall debuted, but pretty sure it was not the 'Folio.

hey, cool :) did they at least keep "also known as..." or did they completely kill the name, which was one of the coolest aspects of this creature? :) Edit: Ah, cool, "the flameharrow (sometimes referred to as an “eye of fear and flame”)" :)

BZZT - demodands were Monster Manual II. ;) but maybe i will move on to that book at some point...

Mike Mearls has said that he was influenced heavily by the first edition Fiend Folio, and wanted to put as many creatures from there as feasibly possible into the new Monster Manual. Given that we have the berbalang, dark creeper and dark stalker, death knight, ettercap, githyanki, githzerai...

I have added this section to sahuagin, Moradin, and Corellon. :) OK cool! is it up yet, so's I can have a look at it? :) yes; one thing I'm hoping is that by putting this pub. history up front in each article, people who are interested in improving the article will know exactly where to...

Hmm, good point - I guess I hadn't considered that it might still be in print! Maybe want to leave those conversions alone then... we pretty much have 3.0 versions of all of those anyway (because, if you didn't know, the ToH versions are just reworkings of stuff from the CC website!), and if we...

I thought Paizo wasn't going to be printing conversions of old TSR stuff for Pathfinder anyway? If I'm wrong, then I'd love to be wrong... What I was thinking was that if mission of the CC is converted to Pathfinder (if so, there should be a site redesign to keep the 3E stuff separate from the...

Well, I wasn't particularly worried about anything I listed above getting deleted - popular subjects are rarely successfully deleted. Still, an out-of-universe section makes an article at least somewhat more viable as a keeper, so this will eventually be slapped on any article I see. :) As for...

Ree-hee-hee-eally...?

I know, but in the meantime... :) I'll confess that I've lost interest in doing any more 3.5 conversions (being that the system is dead and all), but I'm definitely open to the idea of coming back to do Pathfinder stuff down the line. :)

Hey all. :) Check out what I've been doing at Wikipedia, with Orcus, the beholder, and the mind flayer so far. :) It's a long overdue addition, I think. A detailed publication history section makes an article much more encyclopedic and informative, and much more viable as an article...

Hey all. :) Hope everyone's been doing well around here. Isn't it about time to bury the Creature Crypt? :) I don't see any use for it anymore, now that the game has moved on to 4E. WotC is not selling 3E books anymore (apart from any overstock they want to move, but I digress) so I can't...

I'm able to post as of yesterday, and now I'm waiting to hear from Sean MacDonald. :)

OK, I'm in, but i'm waiting to be able to post... :)

OK, I guess I need to bite the bullet and register at the Dragonlance forums. :D