Search results

Well how did you know I was asking what happened to post #11? Also, you're probably ignoring someone else in this thread because they don't seem to be able to see #11 either.

Oh, my sincerest apologies then.

What happened to post #11?

Agreed. What if we changed it to "you folks". I also think "the lot of you" is equally offensive.

"The lot of you." "You people."

Off the cuff here. 1. Sure, go for it. 2. I would just not even ask for stealth checks if his pursuers aren't looking specifically for an invisible cloud. If they are, then no. 3. Yes, if they are looking for an invisible cloud of gas, otherwise no. 4. Full speed 10'.

Puritans! At the beginning of this thread I wasn't sure how bad the word was, so I wasn't sure how to react. I thought it may be 'naughty word', or 'naughty word', or maybe even 'naughty word' (that one would be really bad). I wasn't really expecting it to be 'naughty word' or 'naughty word'. I mean, nobody would write that where...

My apologies to the board for writing the word 'naughty word'. 🙃

So it's N A U G H T Y W O R D

Is it naughty word or naughty word or something else?

See, this is the problem with censorship: What word are we talking about?

We summon the animals of the forest to our aid. Can we still do that? Were we ever able to do that? We're not looking for spirits, we're looking animals, THE animals of the forest, or the fishes of the sea, or maybe even the rats of the sewers. Do we have to do a little reskinning (not a bad...

I agree. Largely selling us the same content we already bought 10 years ago won't work very well.

I still have trouble saying the word "snicker". It has a sting to it.

Nope. I said youns.

A book of optional rules like Unearthed Arcana would be my fourth core book. I like optional rules and really monkeying around with the mechanics of the game.

Youns (yoo-ens). Yourselves.

Maybe one could say that the local minimum coolness of 5e in the 2020s is equal to or greater than the local maximum coolness of 1e in the 1980s. I mean, that would be clearer, right?

Anything's possible but I don't expect we'll be seeing a Norse, an Egyptian, or a Gaelic pantheon in future publications.