Search results

Exactly. Why are we making up ridiculous euphemisms to replace perfectly usable terms again? "Human-Elf Oh, yeah, that's just what this edition calls a half-elf. No, I don't understand it myself."

If it's "fully human", why is it represented by the drow statblock? Let's think about this. Seems like a whole but of "yes...but" and "but its just..." just to remove the half-elf... for some reason.

WotC now endorsing the "one-drop" rule.

This debate is mostly academic because I don't believe either a) people with long term gaming groups are routinely subjecting their players to unwanted and triggering content b) the dodgy dudes who do subject randoms to this deliberately at pick up games or whatever are going to be swayed by a...

I'd only make that assumption since I presume you are American. Amongst my Malay in-laws when they use the term it of course means, Malay-Arab. It's a contextual term. That's speculation. Regardless, what this clumsy attempt at avoiding "problematic" terms ends up looking like is that it is...

Sequel to Mazes and Monsters? Tom Hanks is tanned, rested and ready.

Me ending oofta's life when he fails to follow WoTC directives.

The book doesn’t have magical powers of compulsion. If you don’t like it, say “Not today WotC!” and do whatever you want.

It is his whole narrative arc!

Racism can be defeated by deleting characters of mixed origin. Let's think how that sounds.

Digitial Ownership is not real ownership. I keep saying this....

That tends to happen when you are changing things to appease people on the Internet as opposed to actually believing in the reasons you are changing it.

I wouldn't want the Tasha's "custom race rules", no, because they were terrible and without flavour.

Who defines "low quality monsters"? I might define much of the current 5e content as low quality, others may differ.

Yeah that's not the case for all tieflings, and perhaps not even the majority of them.