Search results

That's because witch is a gender-neutral term. It's just that most people think of them as female like we do with nurses.

I'm not a stickler for game balance.

Kinda off topic but I hate the idea that a straight-up evil villain is automatically boring or bad. I would say "yes, killing the Goblin in that state would be evil". Even if the Goblin raped and murdered a village, it's bad to kill anyone in that sate. It would be understandable but still...

I love elementals and classical mythology, so I might've tried that. I'd go with about one species per creature type. They don't literally have to be the same creature type for each. Races Human (humanoid) Ogre (giant) Centaur (monstrosity) Illithids (aberration) Dragonborn (dragon) Azer...

Templates. Lots and lots of templates. I love using templates for monsters. It's a cheap way to add lots of homebrew to campaign. Living Spell, Shadow Giant, Gerivar, Half-Fey

Wouldn't Jotunblood be more appropriate in that case?

Basic: I would add an Agility stat to balance out Dexterity. Races: Change the term to Species Add Aasimar and Orcs to the main selection Remove Half-Races Classes: Add Artificer to the main book Equipment: Add Firearms to the Weapon selection Other: Optional Epic-Level Ruleset

Considering how many people complain about high levels and believe that Campaigns shouldn’t go on too long, it’s not hard to believe that’s the point. It’s one of the reasons why there’s no material beyond level 12.

That’s something that always disappointed me about later editions of DnD and Pathfinder. It feels like they’re trying railroad us out of having adventures and lasting changes on the setting. These stats exist because someone wants to use it. With how many people that like to turn fictional...

Looks like Asmodeus and the other Archdevils are going to have to go unfought then.