Search results

Also wikipedia (which I'm a contributor to, and help run) tells me it's an appeal to authority, which is a logical phallusy

Yes. If Pathfinder had ever actually outsold D&D Paizo would have shouted it from the rooftops, right? What a marketing angle! To beat the leviathan! Maybe they were just shy

Yeah, agreed. I was at uni around 1995 and the feeling in our whole RPG society was that D&D was old news, stale, done. I had a home game that was still D&D but at uni it was all about Vampire, with some other stuff as a side note. I played Pendragon, Cthulhu, Vampire, Vampire live action...

But if I've used it with the seat closed there will be nothing to flush, is the point

D&D has always been the best-selling RPG. It will almost certainly stay that way. This has little to do with its game design. At best what we can say is that it has always been 'good enough' to not jeapordise its market position. 1. The rules of D&D has changed significantly between editions...

The lesson isn't 'D&D can be dethroned, look TSR went bankrupt'. The lesson is 'D&D is such a powerful brand that it took TSR nearly 30 years of terrible business decisions to go bankrupt'. (I know they didn't actually go bankrupt)

A New Hope

Not online but: At work, every toilet cubicle has a sign that says: 'Flush after use with seat closed'.

It's clear you really want to believe this, but it isn't true. I seem to remember that Amazon had a really good deal on the core 4e books on release, and that's where I think everyone in my group got their books. Later I bought Martial Power 1 as a pdf and some in my group were subscribers to...

Mentzer red box D&D from Trapnell's model shop, I would guess 1987 or 1988. Age 10 or 11. I was already into Fighting Fantasy books and White Dwarf and I already had some GW figures. What was noteworthy was that when I tried to buy it, a man (fellow customer) in the shop said no you don't want...

4e fighters. They have a clear focus about what they do, they're good at that thing, they have interesting decisions to make about how and when they do that thing, and they are genuinely fun and challenging to play.

Agreed. They should have had it as only ever a GM-assigned modifier to the circumstances of that roll. That is to say, no published skills, feats, spells, or class abilities should grant it. Maybe Aid Another would use it. I seem to remember some of the playtests were close to this, and also...

Although 2014 also featured Monte Cook's freshly invented idea of passive perception ;)

2014's main advances AFAIR were advantage/disadvantage and the pseudo-narrative background traits, the latter of which they got rid of.

No, I think it's a good point. Most social situations or exploration scenes aren't run in an initiative sequence. Personally when I GM a more free-flowing game that doesn't have initiative, I effectively become the director of the action. I might ask the players to give a loose statement of...

So, let's say I write an RPG in my spare time and it's perfect. Everyone that reads it wants to play it and everyone that plays it stops wanting to play anything else. I release it anonymously as a free PDF. It's so good that it brings thousands of new people into the hobby. World leaders and...

To me a successful RPG is one that is being played, or has influenced other games/players to the extent that some part of it lives on in the next generation of RPGs that are being played.

And any metric of 'successful TV programmes' that didn't include at least the first two would be a faulty metric. (I'm not American, the third programme didn't reach my shores)

+1 Not only that, they named a bunch of stuff that didn't have names and those names became canon.