Search results

guys, should the first rulebook just deal with the simplest of classes like fighters and thieves? Spellcasters are way more complex. Keep it simple so they can get as many people into as they can. I'd be happy with 5 dollar softcover rule books coming out every 3 months or so detailing a new...

how about none of the above? I'm fine with just classes. foolish_mortals

they have to Vance or there not going to get people back. We had Vancian for over 30+ years. Going to something else was just another break with the past. If they wanted to make a game with a completely different spell system why didn't they make a new game and not call it dnd? foolish_mortals

I agree completely. One of the reasons I haven't bought Pathfinder yet is because of the endless incompatible edition experience I've had with dnd. It's like another edition of dnd and who knows what will happen with version 2 or 3 or 4? That's why other games are getting my money these days...

guys, I know it sounds good but I'm completely skeptical that they can make a system where you can run 1rst, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th edition dnd modules with. If anything, over time I've had a hard time recognizing the new editions as having much of a connection with the earlier editions. Is it...

hi dnd hopefuls, One thing that bugs me is that the Githyanki have stopped being scary over time. They've gone from the ferocious looking monsters on the cover of the original fiend folio to weird looking elves. That turned me off in 3rd and especially 4th. I really like the old scary look...