Search results

The phrase is older, its ubiquity is not. The phrasing of my post was specific.

maaaaaybe something like the current semi-random physical minis boxes? That’s all I can figure.

People will pay for modules and content packs and special minis they’d have a hard time making themselves and all manner of other stuff. Hell people pay hero tier subs on ddb just to be able to have unlimited characters. They won’t have trouble monetizing. If I could use a Time Machine to...

Or, you could just not.

Depends on the setting as I have several, but in standard D&D settings I say they have scales, retractable claws (I truly hate tool using humanoid species with claws for fingers), tails, usually horns, and can have other features (esp wings). In my Islands World setting they tend to be...

It’s the best thing ever as a temporary solution. 9.7/10. My only note is that I wish I could ignore further posts from someone in a specific thread, but I get that it isn’t necessarily possible much less feasible to implement. Yeah I haven’t posted in quite a while, and I haven’t been checking...

Yeah AFAIC im playing D&D when I play the Star Wars rpg, or The One Ring, or Alternity, or Vampire, or Monster of The Week, kids on brooms, or my own game, or an impromptu game with a paragraph of rules*. I don’t care about the precise terminology or whatever. It’s all windex. * “make a...

The clearest example I can think of is her interview with Kyle Brink, especially compared to her more recent interview with Jeremy Crawford. But I see no point in digging further into this, especially since her more recent videos haven’t struck me in that same way, and I’ve enjoyed them.

The other idea I had is to have a combination of invocations and infusions (ie some of the Wilderness Knacks give you items rather than abilities or buffs) and a feature called Ranger’s Bane which gives you the ability to learn how to make a poison, learn a tactic, or learn a magical ritual...

Can’t speak for them, but I’d basically just tone down the Revised Ranger’s first level. Or, I’d use some of my Assassin ideas as Rabger features, like Lethal Hunter: “if you reduce a target to an amount of HP equal to twice your Ranger level or lower, they are instead reduced to 0HP” and...

Yeah I figure either the daughter is the killer and he’s keeping her safe, or he is a serial killer but not the one they’re chasing.

I love it. It’s gorgeous. I don’t love the snout, but that is the only detail that isn’t a marked improvement over the forgettable previous green dragon. They’re fixing one of my biggest gripes about dragons, which is that the color coding is kinda the whole bag. They don’t look like...

Good. It sucks that they took away the ability to buy just the magic items from a book.

I’ll end up buying the big bundle simply because it’s $179 for all three books in both formats. That is literally still how it works, with absolutely no sign of that going away. This will never happen. We have evidence that the fandom will be split between those who laugh at them and walk away...

No.

Which is a choice the player considered when making the character. If they’re in the same party the rogue either isn’t going to be a scout (or Scout), or the two will be a team and work together to be dual scouts. And frankly, if all the ranger has are nature spells to set it apart from a...

Okay? and?

That’s and astonishingly stupid premise. But…I do love Josh Hartnett and will watch his work regardless lol dude isn’t even my type in guys but like…that face. 🤷‍♂️ Watch him be a psychopath? Absolutely!

To be fair, Hunter’s Mark has a strong benefit for actual hunting, and doesn’t require a spell slot most days with this new version.

This dodges the issue. Any Rogue that focuses on exploration (and there are many) will be just as good as a Ranger would have been. The party won’t be lamenting not having a Ranger in tow. Relevance? Since when is the question related to having the two options in the same party?