Search results

Call it: 132,445,610,649.21736147069581076406 Which is what I got when I entered 5*e^24

I would hope so, but seeing as they mention Thunderclap over Green Flame Blade and Booming Blade in the Warlock article, makes me suspect they won't. Yes Thunderclap might be the best if surrounded by enemies, but it's hardly the best for a melee caster.

I hope that Green Flame Blade, Booming Blade and yes even Lightning Lure get in, but it's so far looking like they aren't going to be in the PHB. Or if certain spells everyone complains about being too powerful get nerfed. They're definitely going to highlight some of the weaker spells getting...

They're of course not revealing how the Pact of the Blade and associated invocations have changed. Everyone still wants to know, if it's 3 attacks at high levels.

-Switching spells on a long rest is useful, half of the time I felt picking the Ranger spells weren't going to be good choices either. At least you can get one that's effective to have for the day. -I guess the fighting styles opening up, does make the strength ranger more viable, as you can get...

But a Druid can pull rabbits out of their hats, with at least one of their summoning spells or Find Familiar or something.

A lot about the Necromancer might be about how they change Animate Dead, and they might need to start from scratch on the Necromancer.

I think the Artificer's core identity is strongly steampunk, rune magic stuff would be a secondary flavour like Urban Rangers and Urban Barbarians. Among changes I hope they do, give them the new True Strike as a cantrip or let them be the 2nd best (of the published by WotC classes Rangers...

I've wanted 5e to have Nethermancy back as a subclass of Wizard, I thought the Shadowcaster was a neat idea in 3.5e despite Tome of Magic being a failure in many ways. I'd see it as something between Illusionist and Necromancer much like how the War Mage is between Evoker and Abjurer. Or at...

Abjurer is the one type of Wizard I feel would bother to learn how to use Heavy Armor, but it would be at least 1 or 2 investments of feats to get (assuming single class Wizard). They'd probably have protective sigils written all over their armor.

I think there's quite a lot of differences between the Artificer subclasses, an Artillerist is quite different from the others. Maybe Battlesmith and Armorer are similiar, but they still play quite differently.

Looks more like a Tiefling female to me, even though they've canonically said back in 2e that Tieflings are more commonly intersex or non-binary (depending on ones interpretation) than other species.

Looks like we already got an example of Drizz't being in the PHB art, even if the picture isn't about him.

In my opinion it's Crodlu from Dark Sun and Chocobo being the same thing. A Crodlu sort of is a dinosaur, and a lot of dinosaurs actually had feathers.

I think it's going to be Xanathar's Guide to Everything (2025 edition).

The idea that Aquaman is only useful when he's near a body of water. It's been a reoccurring joke with the character.

I always thought of them more as a Druid that can use a bow, even though it's probably more of a Ranger/Druid mix. I guess the "Seeker" is more a multiclass build, but Primal Strike as something that adds Fire, Cold, Lightning or Thunder to a Bow attack would be key to what I saw in that...

That's a thread for next week when we get all of the classes.

It could be some spell like Moonbeam, but it doesn't really look like a pillar of moonlight.

I think that's actually the picture of Turn Undead in action, because they keep re-using that one.